Publishers Have Finally Said The Quiet Part Out Loud About Retro Games
In a recent move against the archiving of video game history, publishers have finally come clean on why they dislike retro games so much.
Unfortunately, the final ruling is firmly against making gaming history available to all.
the reality behind keeping retro games within a paid walled garden is about charging new money for old rope — and controlling the market to force gamers to play new games.
The specific quote is that “there would be a significant risk that preserved video games would be used for recreational purposes.”
Man, imagine that, free recreation? For those unwashed masses? Preposterous!!
Anyway, the GamesRadar piece is much better than the linked Forbes one. Hell, even the title delivers it straight: "Publishers are absolutely terrified "preserved video games would be used for recreational purposes," so the US copyright office has struck down a major effort for game preservation"
Note that abandoned games (abandonware) are still exempt under renewal 14:
- Video Games-Preservation and Abandoned Video Games:
The Software Preservation Network ("SPN") and LCA jointly petitioned to renew the exemption for individual play by gamers and preservation of video games by a library, archives, or museum for which outside server support has been discontinued, and preservation by a library, archives, or museum, of discontinued video games that never required server support. No oppositions were filed against renewal, and one individual filed a comment in support. Petitioners demonstrated that there is a continuing need and justification for the exemption. They stated that video game collection librarians report an ongoing need to preserve TPM-encumbered video games in their collections and that the "section] 1201 exemption has become a crucial tool in their ongoing efforts to save digital game culture before it disappears." They demonstrated personal knowledge and experience through past participation in section 1201 rulemakings and through their representation of members who have relied on this exemption.
The key wording is “exemption for individual play by gamers”. If you have the abandonware you can keep playing it.
What the article is really about is that the petition to exempt a kind of controlled digital lending for archived games to the public was not granted. That’s too bad but it’s not going to do anything to stop the retro game community.
This ruling mainly affects retro game researchers and historians such as Frank Cifaldi who will need to continue borrowing or purchasing physical copies of games rather than being able to borrow ROM files digitally to run on his emulator.
Question: can individuals donate their own private copies for archival/comunal/scientific/cultural use?
Depends who you want to donate to. The Internet Archive is always accepting media donations for stuff they don’t have.
If you want to donate to someone like Frank Cifaldi you’ll have to contact him directly. I couldn’t find a donation page on his site.
Uploaders are prosecuted first
I'm one of those who would gladly pay for a retro rom if I could legally get it from the publisher/developer. Thanks to GOG and abandonware sites we still have access to a lot of msDOS games... Fuck me, I guess, for wanting to play the games I didn't get a chance to play during my childhood on various game systems.
