Says it all. FF should focus on providing a browser engine competitor to Chrome/Google, not squandering money on rebrands. At 5% (or less?) market share, their core market of tech nerds, and even their near horizon of potential users don't even respond to this bullshit.
Tl;dr: corporate speak, just a rebrand, the new slogan suggests they want to lobby more.
Hope the corpo's at the helm stay enough out of the way of engineering, that gecko remains. Poor mozilla engineers :(
Some excerpts:
Even though we’ve been at the forefront of privacy and open source, people weren’t getting the full picture of what we do. We were missing opportunities to connect with both new and existing users. This rebrand isn’t just a facelift — we’re laying the foundation for the next 25 years.”
We teamed up with global branding powerhouse Jones Knowles Ritchie (JKR) to revamp our brand.
We back people and projects that move technology, the internet and AI in the right direction. (...) With our “Reclaim the Internet” promise, a strategy built with DesignStudio in 2023, the new brand empowers people to speak up
“We intentionally designed a system, aptly named ‘Grassroots to Government,’
Wholly fuck... How are those parasites even get paid money for just sitting around and spewing bullshit?
They can even make an own company of that, to fucking "consult" other companies how to further spew bullshit
Hmm, so the only change is they're adding AI to their buzzwords?
How about they stop talking to branding companies/consultants and just build better products?
Here's a free idea: create a way for me to compensate websites without ads. I'd actually pay for the content I consumer if paying was reasonable. Instead of sitting with branding consultants, lobbying government, etc, sit with the big media orgs and figure out something that works for everyone. Do that well, and I think they could actually profit from their browser, because they're preserving privacy w/o pissing off content orgs.
The old logo also looked far more professional and serious, which is exactly what you want if you're setting yourself up as a serious alternative to Google and Chrome.
They already had a tough time becoming known, with this logo that doesn't link well to Mozilla this is becoming even harder. If you took a random person and asked them who the new logo was for, they wouldn't know. With the Moz://a logo, they could easily figure it out.
The chosen colours are also too harsh. The activists/hackers/whatever already likely use Firefox. It's exactly the pond they shouldn't be fishing in. They should focus on a brand messaging that demonstrates reliability, performance and ease-of-use, being the choice for the casual user. Because that's the market they need to win.
I rue the day that, in the panic of Trump’s 2016 election win, I donated a not insignificant amount to this organization. They clearly didn’t need it and only squandered it. What is this Chief Marketing Officer’s salary?
Prior to Mozilla, Lindsey headed up corporate-level marketing for Facebook Inc. […]
I can't remember a time I've ever been excited about a rebrand.
Sometimes at jobs it has come along with needed technical improvements, but usually it's just "Hey everyone change your email signatures and linkedin photos our new brand is going out!! Aren't you glad we spent time on this instead of hiring more developers/sales/support?"
Maybe I just undervalue marketing.
Back on topic. This seems silly. Firefox was a well known brand and iconography.