Both. In the climate wars prisoners will be used as a slave army.
That should be "risk spending life in prison" -- best to stay optimistic when making long term life plans.
So the other one “Survive the Climate Wars”?
Sometimes fixes require sacrifice which is the dilemma presented by the meme.
The way I read it then is that there is no optimistic side for left since that's the "do nothing" choice and the "take action" choice is the right side.
If I end up homeless there is no question.
You're gonna gimme room and board to avoid a war and die a hero? Say less.
Right side is also: Die in a climate wars penal unit.
The real unfairness is that you gotta spend life in prison because oh! you dare address injustice.
If a CEO doesn't want to listen, wins every court case, and all -- all because he has a fuckton of money
then what else is left? Doing nothing and suffering, or standing up for the fellow wretched?
Edit: What needs to happen, is him being freed from prison. Or at least his punishment severely reduced. Instead, the other CEOs might need to watch their behaviour, and change course. I fear that they otherwise will encounter a widespread revolt.
Which is about time, anyway. People should unionise and combat his ilk.
This is the depose part of how to win
False dichotomy.
Luigi didn't reason it out to the end or he lacked the courage to complete his plan: No one should've found his body for decades.
