You can legally force people to do anything. That's how government works. But that's besides the point. Unionization is better for both members of the union and non-members since it raises the floor
Unions are useful for a lot of fields, but once you get into fields that are highly specialized they only get in the way.
When a company relies on a small team of difficult to replace experts for the majority of their revenue, they either treat their employees well or they go out of business. A union in that situation serves no purpose.
Back when I was younger and worked regular jobs, I would have loved to join a union. Now? No way. A union would decrease my bargaining power.
Lmao bullshit. A Union is literally an equalizer when it comes to bargaining power. It's why they were created in the first place. You claim that being specialized in a field automatically makes you immune to wage stagnation, but if you as a worker(even in a specialized field) are dealing with a monopsony, you are fucked.
Oh come on, we're top of the list for diabetes, cancer, liver disease, illiteracy, excess deaths, shootings, percentage of citizens who will never hold a college degree, and cheapest labour. USA, USA!
why does that initiative “only” need 383k signatures when the abortion initiative needs 600k? i’m assuming they don’t already have 220k signatures to explain the offset
Unions good. Right to work states bad. Right to work states steal from you and you earn less overall than organizing with others for fair pay and benefits.