License to kill -9
110 0 ReplyIt should be "chmod, sudo chmod"
103 1 Replychmod; sudo chmod
26 0 ReplyThat would've been smart
14 0 ReplySmart. Maxwell Smart.
11 0 Reply
"Chown'd, not stirred."
60 0 ReplyHow would you stir permissions lol? Just randomize it?
16 0 Reply5 points for the awk command.
10 points for a perl script.
;-)
19 0 Replycircular shift
3 0 Reply
007
is pretty ideal permission scheme for a spy, though: Deny access to owner & group; let some 3rd party do whatever he likes.50 0 ReplyDeny access to owner & group; let some 3rd party do whatever he likes
I believe thats called the honey pot
15 0 Reply
The man to whom unauthorized sudo attempts are reported.
38 0 Reply22 0 ReplyOh no I'm screwed
7 0 Reply
(after) ...ah crap it's actually selinux....
34 0 ReplySELINUX=disabled
13 1 ReplyFirst thing to do if you need a functioning server
Unless you're a security guy and get off on people not being able to do their jobs due to Access Denied
1 0 Reply
Recently, I learned of the concept of "Linux capabilities". And yeah, as much as I enjoy reading up on these things, the whole time I was thinking, if something's fucky with these capabilities, I'll never remember to check them...
6 0 ReplyFunfact: if you want to run for example HTTP server, you can run it with CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE and no_new_priv.
3 0 Reply
Permanently Deleted
3 0 Reply
Should've been Sean Connery and not Daniel Craig bond in the pic! Missed opportunity.
18 2 ReplyYou can't do that...Connery would just mount and fsck everything that moved instead of fixing the system.
30 0 ReplyAnd need the extra CHMOD, JAMES CHMOD
10 0 ReplyAgreed!
4 0 ReplyI like it better this way :)
1 0 Reply
Bad bad bad!
7 1 Replyssh still doesn't work. I'm out of ideas!
2 0 Reply