The recent transformation of the state’s election laws explicitly enabled citizens to file unlimited challenges to other voters’ registrations. Experts warn that election officials’ handling of some of those challenges may clash with federal law.
The recent transformation of the state’s election laws explicitly enabled citizens to file unlimited challenges to other voters’ registrations. Experts warn that election officials’ handling of some of those challenges may clash with federal law.
Trying to erroneously remove someone’s ability to vote needs to be a crime. This is denying citizens their sovereign rights, and people need to be held accountable when this is done fraudulently.
Just for the record. Dems can do this too. Guarantee some of these trumpets have a lake home and a real home and it would be pretty easy to challenge residency.
Assuming that their challenge law is simple, which if someone challenged 100,000 voters it kinda seems to be.
Fyi. Someone tried this in Montana in the 2000s and was chided out of court.
Fuck that. Let’s run a script to programmatically file challenges for all Republican voter registrations. If they really want to play this game, I am down to clown, motherfuckers.
In light of the fact that the US has no national ID, and the Constitutional ban on poll taxes, combined with the requirement individual states run their own elections, registration is the best option there is.
We need a way to ensure people are eligible to vote, and a way to ensure people only vote once. A big list of "people who can vote" is the answer.
That said: getting on the list should be easy. Removing someone from the list should be hard.