2d ago

Mark Carney, who holds no seat, is being sworn in as Canada's 24th Prime Minister—By constitutional convention, a prime minister holds a seat in parliament… This is a dangerous precedent for the PMO.

en.wikipedia.org List of prime ministers of Canada - Wikipedia

While constitutional conventions "are not enforced by the law courts", this pretty much allows any unelected official to hold the role of Prime Minister.

We need to respect the law, including constitutional conventions.

13 comments

Ministers do not have to be MPs. I think it is to our benefit as a country to move away from the convention that all ministers are MPs. Maybe. I dunno.

Are you just learning about our system now?
All of the opposition could also band together to make May the Prime Minister

this is not the first time this has happened. John Turner was also appointed PM (after Pierre Trudeau stepped down) while not being an MP or senator. He also dissolved parliament 9 days after being sworn in, which is what Carney is likely to do too, I believe.
not saying it right or wrong, just that it's happened before.
- not saying it right or wrong, just that it’s happened before.
  Thanks for this piece of information. It's still a dangerous precedent that is being set.
  
  precedent
  I mean the earlier example says that this isn't the precedent.
  
  It happened before.
  It is actually quite common in the British Westminster tradition we follow.
  The earliest being William Pitt the Younger in 1783 who became prime minister at just 24 years old before securing a seat in Parliament. He won a by-election soon after assuming office.

It's not a precedent -- this has already happened several times. John Turner was PM in 1984 without having a seat. Mackenzie King won an election and became PM all while not being an MP in 1926. He was even a seat-less PM for a couple of months again in 1945.
Prior to the convention of standing for election soon after becoming PM being a hard-and-fast thing, John A. McDonald was in a similar position at Confederation in 1867, and so were two more 19th-century PMs, Abbott and Bowell.
Given the way that the Conservatives blew several conventions out of the water last time they were in power (proroguing Parliament inappropriately, and refusing to allow a coalition second crack at forming a government after an election) I agree it would be a good idea to make this a law. But ringing an alarm bell over Carney specifically is a bit too much. The Liberals are already talking about which back-bencher will resign and Carney run: somewhere in the West Island of Montreal looks like a likely candidate as they are super-safe Liberal seats.

Better to have no seat than no brain.
- I understand you are saying this now, but violating constitutional conventions is dangerous:
  We must respect all laws, even unwritten ones, to be unconstitutional is to be uncanadian.
  This sets the precedent that, well any unelected person could be put into the PMO, which has more power (comparatively) than an American president.
  There's no rules for "brain", so this further sets up the possibility of both no seat and no brain.
  
  Conventions are conveniences. There is no law against a seatless PM. The overriding requirement (again for practical conveniences sake) is that the PM command the confidence of a majority of the house. As it is more damaging to the conduct of business to have a non-functioning Commons than it is to have a non-member PM, the latter is preferable. By convention the PM then seeks election to a seat either by general or by-election.
  Not a precedent. This has happened quite a few times before.

13 comments