Skip Navigation
17 comments
  • If you had read Hannah Arendt’s work on totalitarian regimes (Origins of Totalitarianism) - focusing specifically on Nazi Germany and the USSR under Stalin - you would never think this. As she says, and I am paraphrasing here, the consequence of people always lying to you isn’t that you stop believing everything but rather that you end up capable of believing anything.

    And I’m pretty sure that effect is on full display already.

  • If you couldn't trust anything, that would work.

    But you'll still trust whatever truth you discover on your own. And when a source repeats something you know to be true, you'll believe them when they say something else that you can't verify. So long as that source is internally consistent, they are going to become the verification of what is "true" for you.

    For your system to work, the individual must not be able to trust their own truths.

  • I don't think you need AI for that but it certainly helps. It's good ol' flooding the zone. The strategy is old. To me, it's a lesson of the Soviet Union. If you continuously barrage people with a manicured version of the truth, one that includes Orwellian changes, you get them to unplug. It's getting to be too much work to stay on top of important stuff. So people become pliable subjects for their leadership. One could argue that Putin is running Russia on this basis. Running for a party he's not a member of. Cozying up to the left, then to the right, to the church, and back to the start. He's everything and nothing to all sides. It's a strategy that 47 wished he could run the US with.

17 comments