Wendy Rogers may have violated Arizona’s ‘revenge porn’ law by tweeting x-rated pictures of Hunter Biden
Wendy Rogers may have violated Arizona’s ‘revenge porn’ law by tweeting x-rated pictures of Hunter Biden
Sen. Wendy Rogers shared sexual images of Hunter Biden with her more than 300K followers on Twitter, where users have to be at least 13 years old to sign up.
Sen. Wendy Rogers shared sexual images of Hunter Biden with her more than 300K followers on Twitter, where users have to be at least 13 years old to sign up.
I’m so fucking sick of hearing about hunter’s hog why the fuck are they STILL talking about it it’s been like three years
Because Republican men are obsessed with schlongs.
I don't think even gay men are as obsesses with schlongs as Republicans are.
I thought this week the big story was "Who's line is it anyways" White House edition?
So Hunter has his leaked nudes removed from Twitter. Conservatives saw this as an opportunity to claim a larger coverup. When nothing came to light and Hunter was found guilty of a few other charges they have resorted to literally just posting his leaked nudes.
I’m sorry but if this isn’t just one of the more revealing things about the GOP, I don’t know what is. Make something very normal and done by many people, including members of the GOP, and manipulate the facts to fit a narrative. Push that narrative to the extreme until Fox News reports it as FACT. Hope that wins a few votes in whatever upcoming election. When the initial info is revealed to be bullshit, the plan did its job.
Why post the nudes photos? Because some GOP didn’t get the hint that this was just political propaganda and are following through. The same reason Comet Pizza has been threatened with gun violence.
This is something I've noticed in recent years too - take something ordinary and normal, whip up a big frenzy over it, and then bask in the chaos.
Not just this but a lot of things. Usually it's some court procedure, some clerical process, something actually quite boring. I remember during the election they were getting mad over ballots being picked up by some guy in a van - well, that's the guy who picks em up
It's like getting mad at the mailman for delivering the mail. But you can dramatize anything - every single day a man who you probably don't even know drives around your neighborhood and stops at every single house. He has things which are your property and sometimes he even takes things out of your mailbox and puts them in a bag where you can't see them anymore, probably never again. And there's nothing you can do about it.
Usually it’s some court procedure, some clerical process, something actually quite boring. I remember during the election they were getting mad over ballots being picked up by some guy in a van - well, that’s the guy who picks em up
Remember that a woman and her daughter continue to have their lives turned upside down because one was caught on camera handing the other a mint, and the GOP have still not let it go to this day.
Why does everything blatantly illegal that a Republican do need to be caged as 'may' when it is clear as day that they did it?
My best guess is they do this to prevent defamation lawsuits against themselves. The person can't come back and say XYZ news corp accused me of posting revenge porn and tarnished my reputation.
This is the exact answer. It's also the reason why, for example, most major news outlets refused to call Trump's lies "lies" for years. A word may have one meaning in everyday conversation, but has a completely different meaning that carries infinitely more weight in a court of law.
It isn't, in this case. It says the law may have been broken. Until a prosecutor comes along and goes for an indictment, then the person is convicted, saying that they broke a law isn't a fact.
It's splitting hairs for casual conversation, but when it comes to making a public statement, you run into libel issues.
So, while it grumpy definitely is a fact that the pictures are released, and that she did so, no legitimate press is going to say she broke that law, only that she may have. If she's indicted, then they could say "charged with", or similar language. But until a jury in a criminal case renders a verdict, the press as a whole wouldn't be protected if they said she broke the law. Well, there's other things that would clear that language for use, but they still involve determination of guilt in the courts
Basically, it covers their ass.
Permanently Deleted
Oh God, what I would give to see one of these loons to get convicted because of Hunter BS.
I would love for it to happen too, but not gonna happen. Democrats are too cowardly to go after these right wing clowns.
This is similar to the issue where Republican politicians are shipping people who crossed the border illegally to MA and CA and DC. Democrats should be going after those clowns who organized all this with human trafficking and other crimes, but they won't because Dems just want to the issue to go away. But because Dems always back down, Republicans are emboldened to do it again and again.
This isn't up to "Democrats"
It wholly contingent on the if the AZ Attorney General, a single human being that won her election by 280 votes, thinks that a crime was committed. Maybe we should give her office ((602) 542-5025) a call?
Also, FYI, a criminal investigation has been opened in Texas regarding the DeSantis kidnapping conspiracy.
I'll be shocked California doesn't end up doing the same.
EDIT: Oh look, California is doing the same. I guess your rant is pointless.
I will guaran-fucking-tee you that even if she were charged with disseminating revenge porn, it would immediately be twisted by the GOP to say that the prosecution is an entirely political move against a "whistleblower" who was releasing information on "the Biden Crime Family" that Biden was trying to cover up.
This is what our political and legal system has come to.
Only a republican can be so invested in another man's cock and still try to say they aren't LGBT.
The entire party is ill.
Well their name is Wendy.
Yeh but she didn't start this silliness
I could see maybe if it's a business investment. Like if I'm a totally straight businessman, but that guy has a world-class cock and I don't want to miss the business opportunity, so I bankroll his efforts, you know?
So we can guess Giuliano’s story about Hunter’s laptop is a lie. But did we ever find out how that info got out. Was his iCloud hacked, was his laptop stolen?
The most likely is that his accounts were hacked and the files were planted on a computer along with faked emails and documents. The computer was then passed around by the right wing kook-o-sphere. When the FBI told them they wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole because of all the chain of custody issues with the computer they disposed of the actual hardware and went with plan B which we're living through now: Just pretend like they were right all along.
Can I just say... It's about damn time. This has been nothing short of a revenge porn case from the get-go.
Exactly. There needs to be stronger revenge porn laws which are enforced. As time increases it is likely that there will be fewer and fewer people who won't have naked images of themselves out there.
Our politicians are so classy. Glad they can stay focused on the important shit.
Goddamn morons.
More mayhaves to add to the pile of nothing ever happens
What a twat waffle.
But the consequences?
What a fucking nut job.
Cocaine is a hellava drug.
If this is one of the actual pictures, you should not be sharing this.
Why not? That's an amazing scarf!