I realize this is a divisive issue, but it's clear that these horrific incidents are going to keep happening with shocking regularity. It seems we've all collectively shrugged our shoulders and accepted it as the reality going forward.
Usually about once in incident every 90 seconds. That's why we have to only talk about "mass" shootings, as if you count incidents with fewer than 3 victims it becomes unmanageable.
Itâs closer to who has to change. The millions of gun owners, or the thousand families at the top of the economy (cause every therapy session boils down to âyou need more moneyâ)
None of you ever have a suggestion on how to take away four hundred million guns. And the old argument "We did it in [country]!" falls apart because at no point did you need to take away four hundred million guns from a bunch of armed idiots.
It's not going to happen overnight, and right now, there are some demographics in the US that are rightfully afraid to give them up, because they literally have no options for defense. We can't call the cops, because they won't help, they will only make the problem worse.
Its not about what's easiest, its what is needed to make people stop wanting to harm others. A gun is a tool. You can easily make a bomb from supplies from a hardware store if you don't have access to a firearm
We also don't have a gun culture. The people i know own guns, but don't really want to own said guns. I don't even know where my rifle is right now, somewhere in the basement i'd assume. We usually don't jerk off to our firearms and hope that someone trespasses to shoot them in the face
And US are, so what's your point? The theoretical possibility of having guns and being responsible sure will be a strong argument for gun ownership once US get their collective shit together. Until then, ban'em for a century or two.