Fedora Linux 39 Released As A Wonderful Upgrade For Leading Workstations & Servers

For every major Fedora update I'll try to perform the upgrade from the Gnome Software app just to see if it works, and every time it breaks and I fall back to good ol' dnf system-upgrade. This is the first time upgrading from Software worked for me, and it was fast too. Nice to see all the Software improvements finally paying off.

Now I understand why some people in the comments from other platform said "Fedora is the new Ubuntu"; in popular perspective today! Loud applause to the Fedora Dev team! Respect.

This is a great release, GNOME 45 is looking really nice.
Recommended reading: https://fedoramagazine.org/whats-new-fedora-workstation-39/
- This is a great release
  As KDE F38 user, this is a super boring release. Nothing noteworthy for us to look forward to except LibreOffice 7.6 - which you can get via Flatpak anyways. I was hoping the new DNF 5 would make the cut, but guess it's still not ready yet. :(
  Guess will have to hold out my excitement until F40 for Plasma 6 and DNF 5 (hopefully).
  
  I thought dnf 5 wont come with fedora 40 because that coincides with the next RHEL release so they want both of them to ship the stable and tested dnf version.
  edit - FedoraProject confirming that F41 is the target for dnf5

This is the best summary I could come up with:
While delayed by several weeks compared to their initial release goals, today marks the availability of Fedora 39 as a wonderful upgrade to this popular Linux distribution.
Fedora Workstation 39 makes use of the GNOME 45 desktop for having all of the latest open-source desktop capabilities, the LibreOffice 7.6 office suite, LLVM 17 compiler stack available, and many other updated packages available.
Fedora 39 is shipping with the Linux 6.5 kernel although newer versions will come down as stable release updates.
Fedora 39 also has various toolchain upgrades such as GCC 13.2 with GNU Binutils 2.40, Glibc 2.38, and other updates.
I've also been running Fedora Workstation 39 on my main production system already: the Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 4 with AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.
I'll be delivering some additional Fedora 39 Linux benchmarks in the coming days on Phoronix.
The original article contains 211 words, the summary contains 141 words. Saved 33%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

I am thinking of switching from Linux Mint to Fedora. I have always liked Fedora, but have been bitten by some BS like NVIDIA drivers not working and some programs only available as a .deb file (I know about alien... or do I?)
I love GNOME DE, has that modern "I work on a spaceship" feel.
I mostly do music production and some gaming, so pipewire seems intriguing.
Here is the real question: Should I got Silverblue? I just learned about distrobox, so maybe that is my solution for programs I cannot get through flatpak?
- You can install silverblue, and then rebase to ublue ( https://universal-blue.org/ ). Specifically to the "silverblue-nvidia" variant, and you should get a nice silverblue experience without any of the nvidia struggles, as people at the ublue project take care of that stuff for you.
  And yes, distrobox is the goto solution to run stuff that is basically ubuntu-only, or by extension bound to any distro variant / version and not flatpak. This includes graphical applications. Distrobox works great, I do all my work in it.
  
  Nice! Looks like I have a fun night ahead of me!
  Thank you for showing me uBlue! I want to avoid os-tree if I can, since that seems to defeat the purpose.
  
  I saw that the image was failing to build, so I took a chance and followed the RPMFUSION guide and installed it successfully. I am learning to use toolbox for CLI stuff, but now I am going to learn about Distrobox!!

We really need to all stop promoting Fedora especially after what Red Hat did to the Community with CentOS and closing the code off from downstream.
Fedora is Red Hat in disguise.
Same goes for Canonical. They've decided to screw the Community and try force things on users, Communist style, so they can f right off too!
We should all only use 100% Community based distros and projects because they need our support and break their backs working for the Community.
For example Linux Mint, Debian, Arch, Slackware and others.
If you use Mint like I do, switch to Debian Edition and let the developers know that's where you prefer that focus first and then do the Ubuntu edition afterwards 👍
- Fedora is community based and "independent" from RedHat.
  In the past, they often actively decided against RHs interests and will continue doing that in the future.
  Independend in " because RH puts lots of dev power and $ into the Fedora Project, and loosing that would hurt.
  It's a symbiotic relationship: RH provides money and developers, while we as users test for new technologies that will get used for RHEL in the future.
  The increased ressources provides us with more (also financial) security. Still, if RH somehow decides to abandon Fedora, it will still continue to live on, see Project uBlue as example.
  Also, calling everything you dislike "communist" is just dumb, there are way better words for that... Either, you use communism in the terms of "totalitarian government" like Stalin was, which is just... unfitting (Holodomor, etc.); or you don't get that promoting community based distros is more socialist than you realize.
  Just say "I don't like stuff forced on me from corporations like Canonical" and don't use Ubuntu and thereof. Nobody hinders you in using what you want, and that's great!
  
  But you don't understand - I have reputable sources telling me that Linux is communism!
  
  People have absolutely lost their damn minds over the RH thing lol
  
  The reaction is funny too, because in my experience comparing communities of various distros, Fedora's community is among the the most inviting and professionally-behaving of them.
  Personally, I am not running Fedora at the moment, but probably will when my Framework 16 arrives, since Fedora is officially supported on it. And to be honest, I find that I am making the same choices with Arch as Fedora would have made for me (aside from bootloader), so I feel that I'm wasting a bit of effort.
- How the hell is a for profit company communist. The idiocy of this world never fails to amaze me
  
  If anything the problem seems to be that it's not communist enough.
  
  it's not 'communist'.
  they (rh) can charge all they want, that is allowed. but denying those who do pay the rights granted by gpl (et al.) is not.
- Fedora is like it or not one of the most influential and important Distros out there.
  Fedora is and will always be cutting edge. They early adopt projects and technologies that absolutely become the standard.
  No other distro has this much influence. SystemD, Pipe wire, and other such projects are the norm because Fedora pushed it.
  And like it or not, Fedora will make this move very soon with Wayland. Wayland is our inevitable future, like it or not.
  I don't see Arch, Debian, and others pushing things like this, but rather falling in line with Fedora.
  
  Fedora is and will always be ~~cutting~~ leading edge.
  Fixed that for you ;) .
  
  That's why we should stop using them. If they have zero users, they'll eventually stop the Fedora project and the Community can keep pace with Debian or openSuse. openSuse can easily step into Fedora and Red Hat's shoes.