... this finding broadly assumes that all celebrities were using the same grade of private jet, whereas, in reality, there are some jets on the list which emit far more emissions than others. Therefore, revisiting calculations, taking into account the specific jets being used, rather than use a broad estimate of CO2e, we have the consumption of jet fuel during each of these trips, and then identified the CO2e per gallon of jet fuel.
Interestingly [with] these different calculations, we see that the jet owned by Drake uses an average of 1,722 gallons of jet fuel per hour, whereas Taylor Swift’s jet uses a much lower 347 gallons per hour.
taytay's jet is 5x more efficient than Drake's, which makes Drake look like an irresponsible fuckhead (surprising no one). His plane is basically rolling coal. Even with the adjustments, Swift still tops the list:
1 Taylor Swift 2,971.50
2 Drake 2,904.25
3 Floyd Mayweather 2,205.22
4 Puma/Jay-Z 2,107.72
5 Kim Kardashian 1,752.51
6 A-Rod 1,731.10
7 Steven Spielberg 1,485.69
8 Mark Wahlberg* 1,443.27
9 Blake Shelton 1,357.85
10 Jack Nicklaus 1,129.66
Which means she's flying a lot more miles than everyone else.
So I get how a popular musician who hosts massive concerts all around the world takes first place, but how in the world does a baseball player manage to make fourth?
China and India are renting out their factories to create shit ton of things for the whole world. When the statistics come out, they get blamed for it regardless of the countries profiting off their pollution. why should this be different?
The money from renting it out doesn’t go towards the environment to my knowledge. It’s still not beneficial to anyone but themselves, thus the list makes no distinction.
They’re also not forced to rent them out. They make the decision to trade climate damage for money which is doubly dubious when they probably do not need the money.