salvage waste plastic and reimburse Canadians and retailers for dropping off scraps.
And then what? Pile it up? Throw it in the ocean? Put it on a rocket and throw it in the sun? There is no economically viable use for waste plastic, DuPont came up with the idea of recycling it so that people wouldn't feel bad about throwing it away (and would buy more). The ONLY way to reduce plastic waste is to reduce plastic production.
I agree that reduced reliance on plastic, and production reduction of, is the best plastic plan, but until that happens we can still do the non perfect solution. While recycling plastic does have costs it shows that it is not 100% the cost of virgin plastics. I believe average was 70% energy. So there is still a benefit to the climate. Chemical and Bacterial recycling of plastics is also being researched. Plastic bottles are easily recyclable, but you can only put about %20 old material in with virgin pellets to get another acceptible bottle out. so it take 4-5 new bottles made to fully consume an old one. So it becomea a pyramid scheme we can't escape. People really need to stop buying water in a bottle. There are better options for plastics like the online list of what other products we can make from old plastics, like new home building products, new road pylons, etc...something that needed to be made anyway.
But what a lot of people don't realize is a lot of reclaimed plastic is made into fuel pellets, and used in place of coal or oil for power generarion...all those hydrocarbons are a replacemnt for pure petroleum products, and it has already been "refined" as a cleaner fuel. ( Obviouslu power plant has to scrub any volatiles and waste just like they would with other fuels)
in many cases industries are finding it difficult to source plastic fuel pellets and want more.
Experts say it could create a lucrative system that encourages companies to salvage waste plastic and reimburse Canadians and retailers for dropping off scraps.
One way of helping plastic producers keep track of the products at the end of their lives is to pay consumers and other users to return them — just like many do with alcoholic containers.
"We have an ability to actually incentivize consumers … to ensure that they're able to take plastics back so that it doesn't end up in the landfill and the environment through a return mechanism," Lakhan said.
"We see students on college and university campuses going around and actually collecting these containers off of abandoned tables or out of the garbage and scanning them to accumulate funds to put towards different initiatives," she said.
In a follow-up statement, Alberta's environment minister called the proposed plastics registry a "waste of time, tax dollars" which will increase the cost of goods.
In a news release, Environment and Climate Change Canada said the registry would "complement existing reporting requirements such as those under provincial and territorial" programs.
The original article contains 1,025 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Like the carbon tax is "saving us money"?
So glad that my family and friends can barely afford food now, thank you so much you magnanimous pieces of incompetent shit!
Thank you for expressing your clear lack of understanding of the issue.
Animals migrate, I understand it might be hard for you to know this as, given your statement here, your education is lacking, but they will always migrate somewhere where they can survive.
And, wouldn't you know it, humans can migrate too.
Also, given your statement indicating a clear lack of knowledge on the matter, the earth was objectively warmer prior to the snow age we're still in, and just because the snow age is ending doesn't indicate that life is going to end, it means anything that's not resilient enough to survive the changes will end, and everything else will continue as normal.
It would behoove you to educate yourself on topics before you talk about them.