Who / why puts a downvote on almost each new post on r/selfhosted?
I haven't really posted a lot to r/selfhosted (or Reddit in general), but whenever I did, there was always someone who voted my post down in less than 30 minutes after it was posted. Maybe because of this (or maybe because they were actually perceived as low quality posts), these posts never received a lot of engagement with their 0 scores.
Today I've made a little experiment and posted the same article both here and to r/selfhosted. On Lemmy, it received a few comments and some upvotes, but over at Reddit, it was promptly downvoted to oblivion.
I've never really used "New" on Reddit, but I've decided to take a look at it, and to my surprise it looked like r/selfhosted's New page was full of genuinely helpful posts, but I've never got to see them as their scores were all zeroes.
At this point, Reddit should be considered an informational reference only. Most, if not all, of us have removed Reddit from our daily lives. Therefore, don't worry about the upvotes/downvotes over there because they matter less than they ever did before. If you need an answer to a question, use their search functionality.
Unfortunately, I erased all my content on Reddit, but I asked this same question a year back on /r/selfhosted. It was hugely upvoted, revealing that I wasn't alone wondering why.
Tldr: the community is toxic to newcomers and people learning. There is a veteran circlejerk only feeding on very advanced discussions and novelties. There is very little room for curious, anthousiasts and people stuck in the anomalous state of knowledge. I wrote a post precisely about this a few days ago.
Anyway, I find this community, and Lemmy in general, a lot more friendly and rewarding to be a part of. I really hope it will stay this way.
I have to agree with the second reply there though (and will definitely downvote these kind of posts):
It sometimes feels like if you take any day in a vacuum and look at the posts, it's: 75% things that've either been answered 300 times already or are Googleable; 15% troubleshooting that would probably be better asked towards that software's community; 5% “hey there's an update!” spam (4% of that being from the 300 different no code internal apps builders); and MAYBE 5% original content, questions, or good discussions.
There are self-appointed moderators over there who browse new and downvote anything that doesn't fit their vision. I was one of them, looking for certain "offenses." For instance if someone posted run-of-the-mill war news in an "interesting" sub, with nothing at all novel or intriguing about it, I would downvote it. So I guess I've got my gates to keep too.
But yeah, I had the same thing happen to me in a couple subs. I posted what I thought was perfectly relevant content, and it would attract a few downvotes right away, and then, usually, climb back up as less-zealous people read it.
This happened on every sub I've posted on including when I posted a pic of my dog to r/awww. It's either a bot or a really miserable person. Possibly a bot made by a very miserable person.