but that's just your estimation of it. shouldn't we give a TON of latitude when it comes to deciding that in a sub called "NO STUPID QUESTIONS"? or is your judgement the barometer for stupidity?
It's not about "stupid" for me but about the amount of loadedness in a question. There are indeed no stupid questions - but there are stupid assumptions.
Even one answer from. OP in it's often easy to see if they want to generate knowledge of search confrontation.
what exactly about my responses illicit the perceived notion that i'm upset? simply because i disagree with your poor ascertaition of what a sub called "no stupid questions" should entertain? perhaps more people should disagree with you so you get used to hearing "no".
Most not upset people wouldn’t exert such an effort over someone else’s opinion on something so irrelevant as you have.
And it’s incredibly ironic that you should suggest I get used to people disagreeing with me when this entire conversation exists as a result of you having a problem with what I said.
What "effort"? has no one EVER expressed dissent with you? do you just surround yourself with people that agree with what you have to say? or do you beat people down around you into agreeing with you? seems like we know which one you are. not everyone bows to tyrants.
But those aren't stupid questions, they are questions very smartly crafted to imply a certain answer or legitimize a problem. Then they are not stupid, but smart. And often evil.
you mean like telling people how 'you' disregard some questions in a sub that's supposed to be open to any and all questions because 'you' feel like 'you're' too important to take them seriously?