How does employing a rapist not constitute an unsafe work environment for female employees?
How does employing a rapist not constitute an unsafe work environment for female employees?
So I just discovered that I have been working next to the waste of oxygen that raped my best friend several years ago. I work in a manufacturing environment and I know that you can't fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US). But despite it being a primarily male workforce he does work with several women who have no idea what he is. He literally followed a woman home, broke into her house, and raped her. Him working here puts every female employee at risk. How is that not an unsafe working environment? How is it at even legal to employ him anywhere where he will have contact with women?
You're viewing a single thread.
How are you expecting him to feed himself if he can't work anywhere? There's no such thing as a men's only work place.
I agree that rape should be charged with the same severity as taking a life. But we also need to let ex felons leave that in the past if they can. There's a lot of abuse and oppression that results from permanent shunning. We made the choices in our justice system that we made because of history. Let's not repeat the mistakes of history.
I respectfully disagree. Murder is not at the same level as rape. Rape is awful and despicable, but at least you're alive to recover from it.
That's the thing, many people never recover from rape.
I think more people don't recover from death compared to rape
I'm not arguing that lol. But many people would literally rather be killed than raped and it's frequently cited as one of the things, "worse than death".
It should absolutely be punished similarly.
That sounds like a great way to make all rapists murderers.
No. There's a psychological barrier to killing, even in the mind of a criminal. That's why most murders are actually people who knew each other and had enough emotion to overcome that barrier or people who were scared/abused enough that the barrier was no longer there. (It goes away as a defense mechanism)
That sounds like a blatant threat and attempt at emotional blackmail
-
Many is not anywhere near all.
-
That is an option for the victim in a rape still, there is no option for the victim in a murder.
-
But it is possible to recover, and many do. There is no recovery from being murdered. Personally, I'm glad I'm still alive even if I'm still dealing with my own SA-induced trauma 20 years later.
Murder also has further externalities. When you kill someone, you take them away from their friends and families, who now have to live forever without that person in their lives.
But this whole conversation feels a lot like we're asking "who was worse, Hitler or Genghis Khan?", and it's weird to put either side on the defensive even if there is an objectively true answer to be found.
Yes, but statistically speaking the amount of people who recover from murder (being around 0 to 1, depending on if the Resurrection of Christ is a factual event or mere myth) is a tad lower than people who recover from rape induced trauma...
There is no reason why rape is judged much less severely than torture though.
See that's where I disagree. They're both awful, traumatic events. At least with murder you're dead and don't have to spend the rest of your life haunted by the experience.
I think this attitude where some traumatic event ruins people for life is toxic. Trauma is part of life. People can move on and have fulfilling lives.
And so therefore a rape victim should just put up with rape and move on. They're still alive so it doesn't matter, and their rapist should be able to live with no consequences.
By your twisted logic, you can justify doing anything to anyone as long as you don't kill them. Rape does affect everyone for life, especially the ones who have claimed they moved on from it.
What makes you think someone won't turn around and use your own reasoning to justify doing something to you?
"Trauma is part of life"? Murder and dieing is also part of life. Sorry, but that just doesn't make sense. Trauma in a clinical sense is certainly not "part of life".
They're rape apologists. Everything they've been doing is part of a framework of Motte and Baileys they have constructed to justify and defend rape, and rapists.
Notice they're talking about the nature of trauma in life when this is actually a thread about OP dealing with a known sexual predator at work? How they have been talking about redemption, punishment, and the death penalty when NONE of those things are even tangentially related to OP? That is purposeful and intentional.
They derail threads like this, where there are clear-cut cases to hold someone accountable, because they oppose accountability on a moral level.
They do it because they're rape apologists.
Life is traumatic. Everyone will go through difficult periods. Your parents will die. Friends will kill themselves. You will be in serious car accidents. You will be assaulted and robbed. You'll leave your kids in the backseat on a hot day and you'll fall and hit your head on the concrete in a weird way that causes paralysis.
This is unavoidable. Life is full of these types of events and while you certainly won't get to experience all of them you are bound to experience some.
Lacan says when your subjective perspective on life is shattered, you've felt "the Real" up close. This is traumatic- your psyche breaks and you need time to heal these cracks. They'll never be quite the same.
Let's say I'm a young professional woman. I take a self defense class and have a good job and a nice boyfriend. I have a set of beliefs about the world. For example, most people are good. I have bodily autonomy. I am strong and can defend myself.
Then one night a male stranger pulls me into a dark alley, beats the shit out of me and raped me. All of a sudden, it turns out not everyone is good. I cannot defend myself effectively against a male and he can totally take away my bodily autonomy.
All these beliefs shattered- I have experienced trauma. As Ben Finegold would say- the truth hurts.
It doesn't have to be so dramatic. Any event can shatter these beliefs. I could get a D on the essay I spent so hard working on. I thought I was a straight A intelligent student.. but then when I put my heart into something, I fail.
Belief shattered - maybe I'm not so smart. Trauma. Different scales, same phenomenon.
Tldr: yes, trauma is inherent to life. It's part of our psyche.
And that means we all should tolerate rape. Or violence, or even attempted murder. After all, the arbitrary line of not being dead is the only one that matters and who gives a fuck about our quality of life while we're still alive? And it's all the victim's responsibility because rape is a normal, immutable part of life and we have to accept it. How convenient that you, the rape apologists, benefit while we suffer.
You can justify doing anything to anyone under that logic.
Also it falls apart because many rape victims commit suicide anyway, so this is a particularly disgusting rape apologist talking point. 🤦🤦🤦
Jesus Christ, Lemmy. What the actual fuck is wrong with you as a platform?
Nobody is advocating for tolerating rape. If you have nothing to respond with, don't make up some wild claims. Makes you seem like a crazy person, when I think it's really just you realize you're spewing nonsense and have no reasonable argument against what anyone is saying.
Oh lmfao
If you're going to lie to my face, you could at least try to be subtle about it. At least motte & bailey yourself like a decent rape apologist knows how to do.
What is the point of this? Are you simply incapable of engaging rationally? Does that make you frustrated? I don't understand the purpose of these strange comments.
Nobody anywhere is tolerating rape. Nobody.
Murder, for the victim, by definition, is not a traumatic event.
I can't send a corpse to therapy for any amount of time that's long enough for them to recover from being dead, I can say differently about being traumatized..
And honestly as someone who's used therapy to recover from trauma, I find the idea that "It would unquestionably be better if you were murdered instead" to be so absurdly offensive and dismissive, as if anything of value to me and my continued existence is suddenly moot because I've become "Damaged Goods"
Seeing Murder as preferable to Rape is a highly misogynistic way of thinking that draws too much from patriarchal standards about a woman's worth.
Death is always an option, revival generally isn't.
What the fuck does that have to do with anything?
You are advocating a known sexual predator be allowed in the workplace, knowing other employees are threatened by his presence.
The company isn't responsible for ensuring the rapist -- who is not supposed to be in society in the first place -- is able to put food on the table. It is the company's responsibility to protect its workers in th workplace, and that means not letting a known rapist work around women.
Honestly, those women could probably go complain to the EEOC. They certainly could win a civil suit.
What you're asking for is horrific and a blatant violation of the rights of other people. We don't live under the barbaric practices of the 20th century where anything like this can just be done to you and you have to put up with it. We live in the 21st century where we recognize the rights of victims and communities are more important.
Don't like it? Do what you're telling rape victims to do: get over it and move on.
Women aren't the only victims of rape. Clearly he shouldn't be allowed to work around anyone right? Actually he shouldn't be allowed to live near anyone who could be at risk either. Actually he shouldn't be allowed to go near anyone who could be raped. I think the Soviets already tried a prisoner only island and it didn't work too well.
-
It's not the company's responsibility to employ him.
-
There are plenty of jobs he can get where he doesn't interact with anyone.
-
OP and the other workers have a serious, legitimate, valid fear of this asshole and their rights are fundamentally more important than his, because it's their safety and security on the line, not his or by extension yours. He is not you
-
You're being overly emotional and melodramatic, and it's obvious you're doing it on purpose because you know what you're asking for is horrific.
No one owes that clown a living and if you don't like it, it's too fucking bad. He should have thought about that before being a dirty rapist, just as you should have thought before you opened your stupid fucking mouth.
The people at that job do NOT have to suffer his presence to appease you. They do NOT have to endanger themselves by being around a fucking rapist!
Don't you care about their rights at all? Their rights are being violated by virtue of him being there, doesn't that matter to you at all? Would you want your cousin or your sister or your mother or your wife to work in a situation like that? Or are you gonna insult my intelligence by lying to my face saying they or you do already, so surely rape apologia is good for us peasants too?
It’s not the company’s responsibility to employ him.
I never said they did.
There are plenty of jobs he can get where he doesn’t interact with anyone.
Like?
OP and the other workers have a serious, legitimate, valid fear of this asshole and their rights are fundamentally more important than his, because it’s their safety and security on the line, not his
A lot of fears are valid, but that doesn't necessarily justify acting on them.
their rights are fundamentally more important than his
That was true during his prison sentence. Now as much as he disgusts us, he has served his punishment and has his rights again.
or by extension yours. He is not you The people at that job do NOT have to suffer his presence to appease you.
What does this have to do with me?
They do NOT have to endanger themselves by being around a fucking rapist!
They can quit, they can force the employer to fire him, or they can tolerate it. Fundamentally, there is nothing he can change now to make himself more tolerable to his coworkers, and its not his employers job to punish him again.
Their rights are being violated by virtue of him being there
How?
Would you want your cousin or your sister or your mother or your wife to work in a situation like that?
Why is this the argument? Why can't I have the option empathize with someone myself- why does it have to be a surrogate? But my mom was hospitalized 2 years ago after assault by a student who she still works with. Of course its terrifying know that could happen, but that's why safety measures are put into place at her work place.
rape apologia is good for us peasants too?
Where did I apologize for rape? All I implied was that under the law he had served his time. He is now allowed to exist in society. If you believe in mandatory minimum of a life sentence for rape, that is a debate that can be had. But just like murderers, kidnappers, torturers, terrorists, and other horrific criminals, rapists are sometimes given a chance at freedom again. But you should separate wanting to protect people, and wanting revenge. Wanting revenge is a motive for criminal justice, but don't try to hide it with an argument about protection and rights.
I never said they did.
Yes you did, and your fellow cultists have been doing that the entire day. It's the logical inference from your stances, which you have been desperately trying to bait and switch us to accept with lame Motte and Baileys, strawmen, and complete exaggerations and distortions of your enemies -- we're you're enemies to you, and trust me, the feeling is mutual -- and you're not getting one over on us. You're not going to weasel your way out of arguing that employers are somehow obligated to put food on the tables of rapists.
Honestly you should know better than to presume employers are obligated of anything toward anyone. They don't even really have any obligation to fire him, and if you genuinely were trying to be logically consistent and not some gross-ass rape apologist, you would have used that reasoning from the get-go. But you didn't, because protecting rapists is important to you. Because you're vile.
Like?
Like not my problem. Oh, I'm sorry, I guess that was just a dismissal instead of you doing a simple Indeed.com search for remote work. Silly me. I forgot we're morally obligated to cater to the needs of rapists simply because you're angry that evil people face lifelong consequences for their actions and that is somehow unfair to you (because you fear that happening to you or your friends. Implying you're going to do something nasty to somebody)
A lot of fears are valid, but that doesn’t necessarily justify acting on them.
Well, we're not talking about a lot of fears, we're talking about the serious and credible threat of the presence of a rapist. And OP is justified in talking to his coworkers and bosses about this whether you like it or not. Get over it, like you tell rape victims to do when you're not brainwashing them.
What does this have to do with me?
You tell us, you've made the whole thread and OP's serious problems he came for advice on all about you. All Damn Day.
They can quit, they can force the employer to fire him, or they can tolerate it. Fundamentally, there is nothing he can change now to make himself more tolerable to his coworkers, and its not his employers job to punish him again.
Yep, burden's all on everyone else and so everything must happen in favor of the rapist. The world revolves around him, and the rights of the community are secondary to his. We know that's your stance.
Also an employer firing someone like that is an act to protect their employees and, probably more importantly for them, to protect the business from liability. It's not even a punishment but you're throwing a temper tantrum trying to make it out as if it is.
Actions. Have. Consequences. Get over that fact. Get over the fact that that rapist brought it upon himself, and there's nothing you can or should do about it. What you want is not right. What you want is unconscionable and wrong.
How?
By being a rapist, an implied rapist of women when there are women in the workplace from OP's post. And like it or not, being a rapist makes you a threat to the community, permanently. Rape is an act you can NEVER walk away from, NEVER move on from, and given the horrific nature of the act, that's how things must be for life to be right and just. Just because you don't feel that way doesn't make it not true.
Your outlook and perspective is skewed, but again, that's because you perceive yourself as a potential rapist so that's not a surprise.
Why is this the argument?
Because you clearly don't empathize or care about anyone other than yourself. Especially not OP or anyone in OP's position, or his friend, or his coworkers. Or his employer, for that matter.
Where did I apologize for rape?
The entire thread. All day. Your stance is by its nature rape apologia, and you know this but you just don't care because you don't care about anyone other than yourself and your own feelings.
Hell, if your loved ones were in a situation like that, you would say the exact same thing you are now, and that's what makes you a rape apologist. It doesn't matter to you. You don't even respect me enough to be honest about it.
You can front about it all day, but you are a rape apologist. And until you change your stance and throw away your shitty opinions on the matter, you'll continue to be one. And one day, when something like this happens to someone you love, you really WILL tell them what you're telling us here, and you will destroy that person. If they are a victim, you'll either successfully brainwash them, and they will go on to destroy others, or you'll cause them PTSD and drive them to drug addiction and suicide, statistically.
Take heart in that no employer will ever fire you for that, for what it's worth.
-
Fuck you.
Okay. Let's just keep all the prisoners locked up forever. Well wait, that's kind of expensive. Let's force them to work. You know they're going to have kids, and both parents are no good evil people so the kids must be too. Let's never let the kids out either.
Congratulations, you've re-invented chattel slavery. With the exact same argument of banishing felons from society that was used in the 1600's and eventually evolved into chattel slavery.
Can we do the civil war now too or do we have to wait?
So if we protect our communities, we'll enable slavery. So if we don't want slavery, we have to expose ourselves to rapists.
Yeah, no, you can take your inflammatory, enabling garbage and shove it.
Imprison rapists for life. Stop letting them out in society. Don't let situations like OP's happen in the first place.
It's not an either/or situation. But congratulations. You are the second or third person to respond with a ridiculous logical fallacy.
It is to you because that is how you framed it. Re-read what you wrote. You and your cult have offered nothing but logical fallacies, especially Motte and Baileys, strawmen, transparent threats, and talking points for an anti-justice, anti-victim, anti-woman political agenda. And you do it because you don't care about rape victims or their lives, and you don't care about OP, you're here on your hustle looking to push an agenda.
And I am telling you NO. Get the fuck on. Get off our lawn.
Uh huh. Sure and which of those have you observed in my posting?
Because draconian punishments are typically associated with conservative political positions. Hardly the bastion of women's rights. And above is the real history of how slavery in the American Colonies was started. It was successive pushes for harsher and harsher punishments until they just decided to take the mask off.
Forgive me if I don't want that to happen again.
Look all around the thread. You goons have been at it the entire day. But we both know you don't actually give a shit. You'll step all over whoever you have to to get what you want, including rape victims, assuming you don't brainwash them into your disgusting little cult first.
Because draconian punishments are typically associated with conservative political positions. Hardly the bastion of women’s rights. And above is the real history of how slavery in the American Colonies was started. It was successive pushes for harsher and harsher punishments until they just decided to take the mask off.
Draconian punishments have nothing to do with the thread.
Neither do conservatives or petty red vs. blue politics.
This shit is exactly what I'm talking about. You took a real and serious issue: workers being exposed to the presence of a known sexual predator in the workplace in a situation they can't easily escape, jeopardizing the safety of everyone in that place, and you made it all about YOU. All about your overdramatized and blatant strawmen, all about your own warped assumptions and biases -- I'm not even right wing -- and you created this monstrosity of a straw... caricature of an opponent for you to bash the hell out of.
All so you can endanger innocent workers by exposing them to a rapist.
Because what you're demanding is wrong and you KNOW it. 🤦
You're fucking monstrous. Your spirit is hideous.
You got shit backwards. War is now. Deny or don't still happening.
This isn't a civil war. I've seen a civil war. And this is nowhere close.
That's not what I said.
Me - ... Civil War...
You - ... war is now...
Me - ... Civil War...
You - Not what I was talking about!
Are you just being purposely obtuse then?
I didn't say civil. Can you just not read the fucking obvious?
Also, stop lying with your shitty not quote quotes.
So purposely obtuse it is. I sincerely hope you have a nice day.
No. You don't read. And you make shit up when you read other people's words and assume you know when you don't fucking read what's right the fuck in front of you. Asshole.
Any reason or just being a blatant idiot?
You're being the jackass supporting the tyrrany enslaving everyone.
Or we can accept the past actually does matter, protect our communities and offenders can be the ones to accept the short end of the stick.
You know, like a sane society
If you don’t allow people to have second chances, then recidivism rates skyrocket. Being tough on crime creates more crime (and more prisoners).
Look at the Scandinavian prison model. Reform is what ought to be the focus.
But in the US, recidivism is kind of the goal. After all, we need to keep the for profit prisons full.
For profit prisons are creepy and ought to be illegal, but they're also a small percentage of US prisons. They're not to blame for the high prison population. They're another symptom.
If you dress up enabling rapists, who do not belong in the community, through flowery rhetoric, you deny that second chance to everyone else.
Society doesn't owe rapists anything. It owes everyone else their safety. If the rapist doesn't like it, they should not have raped anyone. If you don't like the fact that your rapist friend is ostracized from the community, you should stop being friends with rapists.
This is why we need to throw rapists in jail for life, and quite frankly, to start jailing their enablers, so communities can rebuild and the trauma from those acts can heal.
When did the person you responded to say they were friend with rapists. When you resort to ad hominem attacks on peoples character, you're signalling to everyone you have already lost the argument and have nothing of value left to say, just take the L.
Well, when did anyone say they were ostracizing a rapist? You want to talk about logical fallacies, you best look at yourself and your compatriots here.
Firing them from a job like that, where they have to work closely with women and have the opportunity to reoffend, isn't ostracization the way you're flagrantly exaggerating it to be. It's called common sense.
The other employees have every right to fear being raped because there is a known sexual predator in the workplace. It's a specific and credible fear that not only is grossly immoral if the company doesn't act, it also will put them in a position of extreme liability. That scumfuck should never have gotten past the background check in the first place.
And you don't care about that because all you care about is yourself. Because like the other apologists here, you're thinking from a perspective of "But what if I get caught?" and that means you believe you or someone you know will rape someone someday -- and you'll keep them in your life anyway, because you don't care about justice or morality, you only care about shielding your friends from consequences.
Seriously, that was my only comment and now I'm also a rapist according to you. This is something else, I can't say I've ever encountered someone this toxic on Lemmy since I've been here. You extrapolated all sorts of things I never said from 2 sentences.
Not that you are remotely deserving of a respectful response at this point, but I'll still give you my thoughts:
I've been sexually assaulted and have had people close to me be sexually assaulted and raped. The insinuation that I am a rapist would be personally harmful to me and retraumatizing if I wasn't aware that you are doing this because you are unable to articulate your opinions on the matter effectively, so you resort to insults. I totally understand the visceral need and desire for vengeance and justice when you or someone close to you is the victim of vile acts. There is someone I grew up acquainted with that if I saw them again in person I would have an intense desire to cause physical pain because of what they did to people close to me. I totally understand the desire for vengeance, and I suspect everyone else on this thread does too.
With that said, when societies make rules you have to decide what the goal is. Is the goal vengeance and punishment, is the goal a better future for society in general, or is it a little of both. We have the sum total of human experience to look back on, we can see what societies systems of punishment result in better outcomes for society at large. We know what systems of punishment result in recidivism more often, what systems result in rehabilitation more often, and we know what systems perpetuate a cycle of violence that never ends. We don't rehabilitate criminals and sex offenders for their sake, we rehabilitate them for societies sake. Because we can conclusively show that if systems of punishment make it their goal to rehabilitate instead of get vengeance, it usually breaks the cycle of violence whether it be physical or sexual. You're basically saying you would prefer vengeance, even if it is at the expense of sexual and physical violence being perpetuated through society generation after generation.
I strongly suggest you read this article: https://www.firststepalliance.org/post/norway-prison-system-lessons#:~:text=Prisoners in Norway lose their,crime rates in the world.
Norway has the lowest recidivism rate in the world exactly because the treat their criminals like human beings. Guess who wins, all of the non-criminals that enjoy one of the lowest crime rates in the world.
Permanently Deleted
Seriously, that was my only comment and now I’m also a rapist according to you.
No, I said you're a rape apologist. And you are. And a particularly gross one too, being that you're sitting here claiming you've been sexually assaulted like that's supposed to make actual rape apologia coming from you somehow valid or palatable. That claim actually makes your stance worse. If you're telling the truth, you're hurting other rape victims by arguing that they need to suffer the presence of a rapist, and live with their safety constantly being in jeopardy, simply because you allowed yourself to become brainwashed by a rape culture so you could gain access to comfort. And like all rape victims who have been brainwashed -- if you're not just some lying neckbeard, then you're not the first brainwashed sap I've run into in my life and you sadly wouldn't be the last -- you of course latch onto every dumb ass talking point the rape culture tells you to because you can't handle the reality of what you have done to yourself. You sold your soul for a place in society, and you drag down other victims, denying them their own safety, just so you don't have to face what you've done.
Do you know the story of the two wolves named Comfort and Dignity? If not, go look it up. Or I'll tell it. You need to learn it.
But it's obvious you're just here with a shitty political agenda regardless, because you came in here with a wall of text talking about vengeance when no one even fucking brought it up. No one brought up vengeance anywhere except for you and your ilk. We over here on Team Justice are talking about convincing HR to fire his dumb ass which is not only well within their rights to do, it is their moral responsibility as a member of the community. You are arguing specifically that they do not, to appease you, at the cost of dignity, safety, and the human rights of everyone else in that workplace. No one brought up Norway or Nordic countries except you and your ilk, because it's a common talking point in the sales pitch you inundate Lemmy and Reddit threads with to push an anti-victim, anti-justice political agenda.
So you obviously don't care about rape victims. So don't sit here and claim to be a rape victim and act like that's gonna inspire sympathy. It won't work on me, honey.
I was sexually assaulted too and I never sold out like you did. I didn't give up on justice. You bear the burden of that. OP's friend should never have to.
You're disgusting and vile.
What kind of society are we going to have if we do that though? Societies with forever punishments are worse places to live specifically because it ends up being used as a weapon. It gets easier and easier to get that forever punishment because this exact argument gets deployed for lower and lower offenses. Your three options are slavery, banishment, or death. And it's usually for an ulterior motive like votes or money. Humans have tried all three in the past and they've all led to more heartbreak and violence than they've stopped.
A sane society wants and works towards peace. You get peace with rehabilitation and treatment.
A better one.
See, in the real world where adults pay bills, your actions have consequences. Those actions tend to be for everyone else and are extremely damaging if you rape them, so what sane societies do is prioritize the interests of the victims and the community at large over the rapist. They imprison or preferably execute the rapist, to guarantee they cannot hurt members of the community anymore without forcing the community to bear the burden of the rapist's presence, for their mere presence is now a problem.
Communities do not owe anything to rapists and are under no responsibility to integrate people like that into it. The act of doing that endangers a community because now they have to live alongside a rapist.
Communities have a large moral obligation to establish a Moral Event Horizon and accept that individuals who do horrific things like rape don't belong in it anymore regardless of circumstance. The community has to be willing to discriminate who can participate or not based on actions. That's what a community does to maintain itself.
A community unwilling to do this is an unprincipled one that usually just thinks rape is morally acceptable or at least necessary to reproduce. A community unwilling to permanently remove a rapist for any reason is just, quite frankly, an evil one.
Rapists don't have a permanent right to participate in the community. The idea that they do has destroyed our society. You have to earn the privilege to participate through following the laws and good action, and if you refuse, you can no longer participate in the community.
Communities have an obligation to establish rules and enforce them through threat of losing the ability to participate.
It's not hard when you don't enable rapists.
Let's say we agree on your governance model. There are non-trivial cases of men falsely been accused of rape by women. Some have even been convicted and their innocence proved many years later. How does your governance model that proposes execution of the convicted account for this?
It doesn’t.
They have a simplistic worldview. That makes them feel good or safe that allows no room for the messiness or complexity of the real world.
The prevalence of simple minded ideas like theirs is why authoritarian minded demagogues like Putin, Trump, Duterte, are as popular as they are.
It literally doesn't matter because this isn't a discussion of the death penalty. This is an individual asking about a serious situation at work you deliberately ran off the rails to push a political agenda. Take your anti-justice garbage and shut it.
Oh, and by the way, OP's friend being expected to work alongside their rapist functionally is worth than death.
They imprison or preferably execute the rapist, to guarantee they cannot hurt members of the community anymore
It does matter because you brought it up, this is what you said, word for word. Do you hope your proposed legal framework to be implemented at any point in time and therefore willing to give it some serious thought or are you just venting?
It doesn't matter because the only reason I even replied was because I didn't realize you were purposefully derailing the thread to push an agenda, and using OP and his serious, personal situation to do it.
You and your goons have said, all over the thread, the most vile, disgusting, anti-woman shit, because the truth is you condone rape and don't want to see other males suffer for it. It didn't occur to you that you could suffer such a thing and have no recourse. You clearly dismiss the extreme moral crime of expecting a victim's friend and potential victims to suffer under circumstances like that -- of course, everyone else in that place can just go find another job, right? Rapists have the right to work wherever they want but not good, normal people. The world revolves around you and your ilk, after all.
You're quite simply a rape apologist. There's no way around it. And so are the mods of this sub apparently.
You parrot the same thing over and over again without answering any of questions directed to you. I was asking about innocent people, not rapists. You want to execute rapists, sure fine. What about the wrongly convicted? You haven't even spared sentence for them amongst all your ramblings. If you are serious about seeing what you're preaching implemented, the wrongly convicted has to be addressed. If you are not going to accept that your ramblings are just that. Ramblings.
You parrot the same meaningless talking points every single thread that is both popular and a clear cut case to hold someone accountable for something.
You ramble about insane bullshit that has nothing to do with OP because you are here on some rape apologia anti-justice agenda.
You are angry at me trying to get something out of me when you don't even have to.
Why? Because the mods are just as sexist and in support of rape apologia as you are. They've been deleting every comment at the top of the thread that uses the terms "rape apologia" or "rape apologist" while leaving up stuff that should also be banned under civility rules but supports their side. You could just go talk to a mod and have me banned, like you always do whenever I tell you you're doing something wrong. So why be upset I won't play your horrific game?
Go cry to them about how rapists don't deserve to suffer consequences for their actions. Go cry to them how everyone else has to bear the burden and the threat of their presence because you think a rapist's right to rape is more important than the human rights of other people. Go cry to them: they'll agree with you. They've already shown they have.
Go. Go repeat your talking points to them. Go now. On your bike.
Sounds more like a backwards medieval society than a ‘sane society’.
Most modern and sane societies have a concept of rehabilitation and have found that we are all better off when a justice system is centered on rehabilitation and addressing the roots of crime at a deeper level, beyond just punishment, punishment is not very effective on its own.
That's because your idea of a sane society is a rape culture patriarchy where men can do what they want and women have to put up with it. We have a term for what you're asking for. It's called a slave racket.
And we're not your slaves.
Rehabilitation and punishment have nothing to do with what OP is talking about and in modern and sane societies, rapists aren't allowed to work alongside their victims. But sadly, there are very few modern and sane societies, if any, because the truth is you all want to rape, benefit from rape, and benefit from seeing others raped. You're just evil. There's no way around that.
You're just looking for excuses to protect a rapist. You're sick.
How can you say all that when you don't even know what the victim was wearing?
Please tell me you're joking. Please. For my sanity
I am not serious, lol. Can I ask how you think we as a society should handle these individuals? I know you said that they "should get the short end of the stick". Does that mean execution? Life-imprisonment?
Are you being serious about that question?