No, but you better ditch brave and set up Firefox. They did some shady shit in the past and tried to deny or cover it up.
87 7 ReplyAnd it’s based on Chromium which does the open web no favors.
51 0 ReplyLibrewolf is probably a safer choice.
16 14 ReplyOn mobile?
5 0 ReplyThis is the right answer.
2 1 ReplyPermanently Deleted
1 1 ReplyLots of Firefox fanboys on here I see....
5 6 Reply
Permanently Deleted
1 8 Reply
Permanently Deleted
23 1 ReplyThe Brave ad blocker is based on uBlock Origin, AFAIK, so no, you don’t need it.
14 4 ReplyNot sure why you're getting downvotes because you're essentially correct. Their adblocker is written in rust and they say it's based off uBO.
6 0 Replyis it not open source?
1 0 Reply
Permanently Deleted
5 0 ReplyDepends on what block lists you use and how aggressive you want the filtering to be. Ive
1 0 ReplyDepends on what block lists you use and how aggressive you want the filtering to be. I've been using Brave for a while and tested it with and without uBO. With Brave Shield set to aggressive blocking (what I higly recommend) it blocked about 99,5 of all the stuff uBO would block.
2 1 Reply