MP pledges to push for Crooked House law
MP pledges to push for Crooked House law
Marco Longhi wants to see better protection for heritage buildings after crooked pub's demolition.
Archived version: https://archive.ph/TTSEJ
An MP has told a public meeting he will pursue a law granting better protection for heritage venues in the name of a pub which was demolished after a fire.
About 100 people attended the meeting after the 18th Century Crooked House, near Dudley, was destroyed less than two days after the fire.
Marco Longhi, Conservative MP for Dudley North, said he would love to see a Crooked House law protect other venues from the same fate.
The fire is being treated as arson.
South Staffordshire Council has said it was looking at possible enforcement action against those responsible.
Speaking at Himley Hall, Mr Longhi urged patience and asked residents to avoid speculating about the circumstances of the fire on social media.
He said the building, which sank due to subsidence caused by mining works in the area, would "rise from the ashes", but it would be a "marathon, not a sprint".
"I don't believe our current legislative framework is strong enough," he said. "I would love to see, in future, a Crooked House law.
"It is important we make a change in the law. Our historic pubs and buildings are not protected adequately."
The MP pledged to bring the matter to Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, as soon as parliament reconvened in September.
The pub, known for its sloping walls and floor, was bought from Marston's by ATE Farms Limited in July.
On Tuesday, the BBC revealed its owners had experienced a huge fire on other land they owned.
Members of the public voiced concerns about a smell from the stream that runs alongside the pub and rubbish being dumped at the site.
Speaking after the meeting, residents reiterated their support for the venue to be rebuilt.Dawn and Paul Craig said the landmark should be reconstructed in the same spot, but better lighting would be needed on the approach to avoid people using the driveway as a "tip".
John Hutchinson, who ran the pub as a relief manager in the 80s and 90s called for the new owners to explain what had happened. "Where are they, why haven't they come on camera and faced the public?" he asked.Others expressed disappointment South Staffordshire Council did not attend the meeting.
Fencing has now been erected around the ruins, after the Health and Safety executive ordered the owners to make the site safe.
Mr Longhi said the behaviour of people who had been removing bricks and other debris from the rubble was "disgusting" and said he was happy the fencing was up.
South Staffordshire Conservative MP Sir Gavin Williamson has also voiced his support for restoration of the site.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
An MP has told a public meeting he will pursue a law granting better protection for heritage venues in the name of a pub which was demolished after a fire.
Marco Longhi, Conservative MP for Dudley North, said he would love to see a Crooked House law protect other venues from the same fate.
Speaking at Himley Hall, Mr Longhi urged patience and asked residents to avoid speculating about the circumstances of the fire on social media.
The MP pledged to bring the matter to Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, as soon as parliament reconvened in September.
Members of the public voiced concerns about a smell from the stream that runs alongside the pub and rubbish being dumped at the site.
Speaking after the meeting, residents reiterated their support for the venue to be rebuilt.Dawn and Paul Craig said the landmark should be reconstructed in the same spot, but better lighting would be needed on the approach to avoid people using the driveway as a "tip".
I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Don't we already have laws for this? How about enforcing them?
There was that pub that got demolished the other year and they were made to rebuild it exactly as it was.
Lol I thought this was going to be something to do with fighting corruption... Of course not, how silly of me!
Great. More LAW for criminals to ignore.
I'm assuming the point of it would be to make this kind of thing explicitly illegal instead of relying on arson/planning laws.
That should make it easier to prosecute those doing this kind of thing.
More LAW only ever means more Lawfare against the people as a whole. Criminals don't give a shit and as for "make(ing) this kind of thing explicitly illegal" that's just as vague as the new law would be. The property could have been sold with a covenant and still have accidentally been burnt down with
by the owners employing anArson(ist).