same or similar story (?) about the guy who stalked a woman at an ATM and made her give him all her money ($20) and then made her show him her account balance on the ATM screen and when he saw it was $0 He smirked in pity, gave her the $20 back and left.
okay I'm reading through all the comments hoping somebody will explain the cartoon. But nobody has. Why in the last panel is the gun wielder standing right next to the burglar after clearly having missed him, but the gun wielder looks triumphant and proud of himself, why?
seems to me the world and the homeowner wouldve been better off if the bullets had been aimed at the robber
unless maybe he's in one of those states where you're not allowed to shoot people unless it's in self-defense. like those ass-backwards jurisdictions where robbers can sue the homeowner.