Tell me you have no fucking clue about the contents of the constitution or the concept of rule of law without telling me you have no fucking clue about the contents of the constitution or the concept of rule of law.
This is basically saying that states supersede the federal government on border policy, which is patently absurd. You either believe in the rule of law or you don't. You don't get to have it both ways. The conversation justices in this case are complete buffoons.