Researchers, journalists are blocked from sharing the alleged identity of Stonetoss.
X has locked and suspended the accounts of journalists and researchers who shared the alleged identity of a neo-Nazi cartoonist known as Stonetoss after the cartoonist appealed to site owner Elon Musk.
The incident, critics say, highlights once again how Musk has not only welcomed extremists onto his platform but has repeatedly boosted their conspiracies, engaged with their accounts, and seems to have protected them from scrutiny.
“If Elon’s idea of a ‘free speech’ website is one where people can be intimidated into silence, the outcome will be a site where the Stasi will drive out all dissent,” Stonetoss wrote.
Wasn't sure if this was the right place to put it, it seems tech to me since they're making tech gateway, decisions for social platforms? I'll delete if it's not the right place.
I think it’s fine to leave it. I’m not the mod for this comm, anyway. I’m not sure where I’d have posted this either, it kind of spans topics while not cleanly fitting into any specific one? Ars Technica is ostensibly about tech 🤷
I think it was already the precedent for mainstream social media to delete illegal content from their sites (such as doxxing). Although they did delete the entire accounts of the doxxers, not just the dox itself, which I think is setting a precedent.
Doxxing is a crime in California where X is located. I'm not surprised it was deleted and removed. Stonetoss sucks but they did just straight up dox him.
The incident, critics say, highlights once again how Musk has not only welcomed extremists onto his platform but has repeatedly boosted their conspiracies, engaged with their accounts, and seems to have protected them from scrutiny.
A lengthy X thread posted by the antifascist research group Anonymous Comrades Collective last week claimed that Stonetoss is a man named Hans Kristian Graebener from Spring, Texas.
Stonetoss cartoons, which feature simple and colorful imagery coupled with racist, homophobic, and antisemitic language, have become hugely popular among right-wing communities since they were first published at least seven years ago.
On Thursday, the Stonetoss account appealed to X users who have “a direct line” to Musk, X’s owner, to help to get the thread deleted.
“If Elon's idea of a ‘free speech’ website is one where people can be intimidated into silence, the outcome will be a site where the Stasi will drive out all dissent,” Stonetoss wrote.
“There is a whole ecosystem of artists out there who cannot (or have stopped) making art because of people on twitter organized to punish them IRL for doing so.” The cartoonist also added that sales of his plush toy were “going gangbusters” since his alleged identity was revealed.
The original article contains 356 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 44%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
JANNIES COPE FOR FREE CHUCK FOR FREE CHUCK'S CHUCK'S CHUCK'S CHUCK'S CLEAN IT UP FLOYD HOT POCKETS COPE CITY SLICKER JANNY AND SEETHE SEED CHUCK ON LEMMY JANNIES DILATE ON LEMMY JANNY SNEED'S JANNIES FOR FREE AND CHUCK'S SEED SUCK ON LEMMY CHUCK JANNY ON LEMMY JANNIES FLOYD CHUCK'S CLEAN IT UP COPE FOR FREE FLOYD AND I CAN'T DILATE SUCK FOR FREE FEED ON LEMMY DILATE
SNEED HOT POCKETS ON LEMMY I CAN'T SEED ON LEMMY SEETHE CLEAN IT UP CHUCK SNEED FOR FREE I CAN'T CHUCK AND FOR FREE DILATE SUCK SEETHE SEED HOT POCKETS CITY SLICKER DILATE CITY SLICKER HOT POCKETS FLOYD COPE FUCK SUCK I CAN'T CLEAN IT UP CLEAN IT UP ON LEMMY COPE I CAN'T I CAN'T CHUCK'S SNEED'S FUCK SNEED'S SEETHE FUCK FEED FUCK COPE AND SNEED'S I CAN'T AND FOR FREE FUCK
FOR FREE JANNY FUCK CHUCK'S AND FUCK SNEED'S CLEAN IT UP FUCK SNEED'S SUCK DILATE AND JANNY CHUCK SEED JANNIES I CAN'T FUCK AND FLOYD JANNY SUCK COPE SNEED'S JANNIES SNEED'S HOT POCKETS DILATE DILATE FUCK I CAN'T FLOYD I CAN'T I CAN'T ON LEMMY FUCK SEED HOT POCKETS FUCK COPE DILATE I CAN'T I CAN'T AND JANNY JANNIES SNEED'S FLOYD FOR FREE