In Britain after WWII there was a severe housing shortage and the solution they came up with was "row houses" basically large apartment blocks. The genius part of this was along with this you also got an allotment. A small parcel of land where you could garden and enjoy the outdoors.
Doesn't sound like the libs core m-o. Maybe, like this pipeline fiasco, they were convinced it would make the PCs their friends, and it failed as miserably then too?
My grandparents had a council house in the UK, thankfully the allotmemt was just an extended back garden/yard. It was affordable housing for a family of 8.
Personally I think countless 3-5 storey steel-concrete multi-unit buildings are preferable from density, comfort (sound and heat insulation) and durability standpoint.
Absolutely, when it comes to constructing 3-5 storey buildings, steel structure buildings offer numerous advantages over traditional methods. Steel structures are not only strong and durable, but they also allow for greater design flexibility, which is particularly beneficial in mid-rise construction.
Steel structure buildings can be erected quickly and efficiently, reducing construction time significantly compared to concrete. Additionally, the prefabrication of steel components in a controlled environment ensures higher quality and precision, minimizing onsite errors and delays.
Moreover, steel structures are highly resistant to natural disasters like earthquakes and fires, making them a safer option for multi-storey buildings. The adaptability of steel also means that these buildings can be easily modified or expanded in the future, providing long-term value for developers.
In urban settings where space is often limited, the lighter weight of steel structures compared to concrete also means less impact on the foundation, which can be a critical factor in certain terrains. Overall, for 3-5 storey buildings, opting for steel structures is a smart choice that combines durability, speed, and design flexibility.