XZ Utils is back on GitHub and Lasse Collin has been unbanned
XZ Utils is back on GitHub and Lasse Collin has been unbanned
XZ Utils. Contribute to tukaani-project/xz development by creating an account on GitHub.
You're viewing a single thread.
Can someone provide a summary on what this means? I thought there were malicious exploits in this. Why is it back up and the perpetrator unbanned?
56 24 ReplyLasse Collin is not the perpetrator, that would be "Jia Tan".
151 0 ReplyLasse is the original maintainer of XZ, they have been placed back in their position as sole maintainer.
"Jia Tan" was the person who slipped the backdoor into XZ and is now banned.
Lasse has already fixed abd removed the backdoor.
XZ itself is critical software everyone uses (its one of the main compression/decompression programs used on linux)
88 0 ReplyYes but damage seems to be done. Distros are talking or have moved off of it to zstd.
7 3 ReplyThere are some, probably. But any exodus will be slow. Xz isn't useless because it was dangerous once.
22 1 ReplyBesides, XZ isn't the only project in such a danger. Banning doesn't solve that problem. They need to put in more funding and eyes.
11 0 Reply
I would argue this might make xz safer mid-term. So much eyes on it. I’m not familiar with other solutions, but who’s to say the bad actor won’t try a similar trick elsewhere
7 0 ReplyZstd and xz fullfil different needs. Xz take more time to compress and is faster to decompress as far as I know.
6 0 ReplyXZ is a slog to compress and decompress but compresses a bit smaller than zstd.
zstd is quite quick to compress, very quick to decompress, scales to many cores (vanilla xz is single-core only) and scales a lot further in the quicker end of the compression speed <-> file size trade-off spectrum while using the same format.
3 0 Reply
Exploits were removed. Maintainer who committed them still banned. xz is a critical piece of software.
56 1 ReplyThere's a Wikipedia article regarding this incident. Have a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor
42 1 ReplyThe second maintainer was most likely the culprit.
37 1 ReplyThis sounds just like something Jia Tan might say...
35 0 ReplyDon't downvote people asking questions.
36 5 ReplyPermanently Deleted
0 0 ReplyIt's just a question. Any implications or tone you perceive here is likely your own projection.
Try and read it assuming the poster is asking in good faith.
0 1 Reply