Bulletins and News Discussion from April 29th to May 5th, 2024 - Césaire's Boomerang - COTW: United States
Also known as "Foucault's boomerang" or the "imperial boomerang".
Image is of a sniper on the roof of the Indiana Memorial Union at Indiana State University, overlooking a student protest.
The Imperial Boomerang is the observation that the tactics of mass oppression and totalitarianism used by Western countries in their colonies and neocolonies will, sooner or later, return home to be used against the citizens of those Western countries. While the people living at the time of WW2 were, rightfully, in deep shock of the concentration camps used by Nazi Germany, those paying attention to what was occurring in Africa would not have been terribly surprised. Concentration camps were used in several countries in order to separate out ethnic groups and place them in more easily controlled environments which aimed to prevent them from rising up and fighting back against the Western governments which exploited them. There is the additional factor of governments taking notes from each other - Hitler was inspired by America's racial segregation and genocide of indigenous groups, which author Carroll Kakel among others have written books on.
Today, the totalitarian strategies used by the Zionist entity in occupied Palestine are being brought home to Western countries as the American Reich and its global influence accelerate in their decline. Gaza was and is a cyber-concentration camp, with digital surveillance taking place alongside old-fashioned techniques of paying informants. Aside from being an unsinkable aircraft carrier and disrupting the entire Middle East, Israel's primary role appears to be to generate new ways to monitor entire populations. Propaganda about China being an authoritarian police state with social credit scores and AI which knows where everybody is at all times was probably created, at least in part, to deflect attention from Israel doing those exact things. The paranoid and flimsy American regime with its gerontocratic upper circles now use these tactics at home: cracking down on any and all protestors with political views left of Mussolini; placing snipers on roofs ready to fire at the slightest provocation; and arresting organization leaders. Pegasus has wormed its way around the world, with a notable recent example in Poland, in which the previous conservative government used the spyware to monitor the current liberal ruling party. The Israeli military, experts only in killing children and not actual warfare, have trained the police of other nations.
It would be easy to end the preamble there, on a gloomy note about the brick wall - or, indeed, iron curtain - that upstart left-wing groups are up against. What history has shown is that these regimes are, in fact, beatable. Liberation movements around the world have found ways to counter imperialism, even if they required wars in which millions of their countrymen were murdered. The legacy of Israeli propaganda psyops and digital tracking is not victory, as Hamas demonstrated on October 7th and continues to show with every ambush executed and every Merkava destroyed. The legacy of Western military defence equipment is not success, demonstrated by every missile fired by Hezbollah and Iran which hits Israel. The legacy of the American Navy is not competence, with a naval blockade of the Red Sea still maintained after months by one of the poorest countries on the planet.
The protests of at least the last couple decades have been marked by failure to produce material results: from those against the Iraq War, to Occupy Wall Street, to the BLM protests of 2020. Of course, it would be silly to tell American protestors to start digging tunnels. But sooner or later, the failure of Western protest movements will be overcome, and a more effective strategy will be devised, in order to deflect the boomerang.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is the United States! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Thoughts on Klippenstein leaving The Intercept to become a fearless truth teller on Substack? Taibbi and Lee Fang and The Intercept gang like Greenwald all strike me as narrative pinball machine bumper removed intelligence community patrons. But Klippenstein is visibly one of the least ghoulish. Did I miss him being a gigantic lib? I don't really follow journalists obsessively but hopefully you do.
Substack isn’t all types, if that’s what you mean. Adam Johnson has one, there are good ACAB news roundups, real Covid news, some good literary criticism, etc. Many of the big names on there are odious but it’s not libs-only.___
Adam Johnson also has terminal journalism brain so I guess that makes sense
I also read Taibbi + Lee Fang even if they're really annoying and seem to be spinning disclosures a certain way to attach them to feuding online cliques and mute their impact, idk. Sensationalism is a weird kind of muting but it works really well in addition to blacking out important stuff from the media
He’s a good guy. Far better at both journalism and having reasonable opinions than any of the clowns you just mentioned. He’s not explicitly a socialist, afaik, but his work generally involves making the state look bad by exposing the things that they do, so he’s pretty much always on the right side of things. He’s also right that The Intercept is just another corporate news outlet with hard limits on what they’re able to do in terms of journalism. Unless I hear different, I would assume he’s leaving for the reasons he says he’s leaving, plus maybe to go make more money (as well he should, he doesn’t need The Intercept).
He’s not going to suddenly start podcasting with Jordan Peterson or writing about how there are too many wokes on college campuses, if that’s what you’re asking.
Sure, but when leaving The Intercept he doesn't really extensively call out their shady ties to CIA linked financiers, or their agreements to vet their leaks with the intelligence community and try to make sure those leaks never impact the safety of spies, which sounds like such a broad excuse, and even when Assange was idealistic enough to try that shit it wasn't treated as a tit-for-tat exchange, The Guardian, NYT, et al ignored the gesture and still dragged him as a seditious criminal etc. It's not like Klippenstein is mentioning they probably got that drone whistleblower locked up. He just gestures to them having sold out now? Weren't they always sellouts to Omidyar and the rest of the intelligence community?
Source vetting is complicated, there are substacks that are great in singular very specific areas and suck ass whenever they leave that. Just because a person may or may not suck (I don’t follow this guy, idk) does not mean they aren’t worth reading critically because of their specific expertise/knowledge base.
If you feel he has good reporting on anything you care to follow, if able, grimace and look past the brainworms. Much like accepting the pain a couple days after heavy lifting to grow physically stronger (unless the brainworms are unbearable).
Example: simplicius is a straight up chud with a narrow focus of expertise in military matters. Often cited here. Damn near everything outside that he mentions or writes about is dog shit, still a good source on the SMO.
Again, I’m very ignorant on this person. If you make the judgement call that you can still learn from the writing presented, a comrade is learning and growing by doing so. That’s good.
Does that answer at all or did I miss the point? Like, the intercept in general is a critical support at best type thing given their ties to chuds. Still valuable in certain ways. Leaving is neutral. The journalism output by the individual isn’t going to change by going independent unless the intercept was heavily editing/influencing the output. If it was worth before, it might still be after.
Sure, I do the same thing of including people who are informative, or forums which I have seen specifically named by Israeli intelligence orgs for monitoring and infiltration (Sino Defence Forum etc.) if they're helpful enough. Those intel orgs are on Mastodon so I can assume they are here in some capacity - they bill themselves as having enough resources and manpower to do pretty much anything NATO+ feds require stalking-wise from age 15-up developing profiles on people. I guess I was curious what quirks Klippenstein might have in the same way that - for instance - someone like John Kiriakou has an odd affection and history with RFK Jr. that just screams fed. Or Aaron Mate being weirdly confrontational about "conspiracy theories" on ex-Twitter. I swear Russia Today is riddled with US assets. Maybe I've lost the plot.