Google Chrome’s plan to limit ad blocking extensions kicks off next week
Google Chrome’s plan to limit ad blocking extensions kicks off next week
Chrome's Manifest V3 transition is here. First up are warnings for any V2 extensions.
Reminder to switch browsers if you haven't already!
- Google Chrome is starting to phase out older, more capable ad blocking extensions in favor of the more limited Manifest V3 system.
- The Manifest V3 system has been criticized by groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation for restricting the capabilities of web extensions.
- Google has made concessions to Manifest V3, but limitations on content filtering remain a source of skepticism and concern.
You're viewing a single thread.
As with others, I use Firefox for my main browser, and Brave when I need a Chromium-based browser for something. I don't see many ads...
Consider ungoogled chromium instead. Brave is not great, it just has the advantage of being heavily promoted by the middle part of the (privacy nerds) and (want privacy because their beliefs are rejected by most of human society) venn diagram.
I use that on my personal computer, but at work I'll occasionally hit sites other than what I'm debugging, and Chromium has ineffective ad-block, whereas Brave has reasonable ad-block. I can't control the network at work like I can at home, so I can't really rely on something like a pi-hole or whatever.
As a web browser with an embedded ad-blocker, it works fine. I'm not going to stop using something because someone distasteful is using it, I'll stop using it if it no longer meets my needs. It blocks ads and renders as Chrome would, so it works well enough for me.
I disable the crypto nonsense and pretty much only use it for debugging work stuff. Sometimes that means I need a JSON formatter or something, and those sites are riddled with ads w/o an ad-blocker.
oh, hrm. Im not sure what specific build you're using, but the one I'm using has mechanisms for installing normal adblockers like ublockorigin. note: afaik, this doesn't solve the problem indicated in this thread -- I'm operating on the basis that the blocking functionality will be nerfed. However for me, I use it purely for (stuff that doesnt work in firefox) and my jellyfin server (since firefox is kinda particular about hevc videos...you can kinda get them to work in windows, but in many cases I dont fully understand jellyfin still tries to transcode to 264).
worth stating that "because someone distasteful is using it" is a reasonable misunderstanding due to me assuming some knowledge. Brave was created because firefox kicked a homophobe out and he wanted to make a browser. Said person is also clearly a cryptonut, which makes him a yet more negative person in my book. Now, unrelated to that base, you have a lot of people out there who are promoting it by my personal experience in more privacy centric groups is that these promoters are often quite...unsavory. Is that enough to stop using software? not necessarily. Is it enough when there are far better options out there? to me, absolutely.
At home, it's whatever ships with my Linux distribution. I use it mostly for web dev testing (I dev on Firefox, test on chromium) for personal projects, and for my kids to play certain games (Firefox works most of the time for that).
Brave was created because firefox kicked a homophobe out and he wanted to make a browser.
Sort of, but I don't think that's really telling the whole story.
Brendan Eich was the CEO of Mozilla for many years and was the initial creator of JavaScript. He was ousted because he made a private donation to block gay marriage legalization in California. There is no evidence that he was or is a homophobe, just that he didn't believe that gay marriage was something that state should legally recognize. By all counts, he was pleasant to work with regardless of sexual orientation, the issue was that someone found out about his donation. He didn't harm anyone and wasn't unfair, he just made a private donation.
I think he was a great CEO, and Mozilla needs a technical CEO imo (in fact, everything started going downhill around when he left). I disagree with him politically, but if I avoided every product where I disagreed with the executive team politically, I'd have to avoid pretty much every product (and quit my job).
So I need a better reason to avoid Brave. I'm not sure what the plan is for their cryptocurrency, and I honestly see it as more of a gimmick than anything. It's easy to disable, so whatever, it existing doesn't impact me.
I also don't actively recommend it to anyone, I always recommend Firefox or a Firefox derivative. The only time I recommend it is if someone needs a Chromium-based browser and wants ad-blocking, and Brave works well for that. If they just need Chromium and don't need ad blocking, I recommend Chromium.
If you have a better alternative, I'm interested. I literally just need a Chromium-based browser that works on macOS (what I use for work) with proper ad blocking. I don't need to sync anything, it'll only ever exist on that one device. I also need something for Linux, and open source is more important than ad blocking there.
I'm also interested in Brave Search since it uses its own index. I currently use DDG, but search results are kinda crappy so I'm looking for alternatives.