Maybe 70 years ago it could be possible, nowadays teenagers are just waiting to be 18 to get naked at OF.. so in my humble POV better for her to be "groomed" by only one man than be groomed by thousands of them.
I truly don't give a flying fuck about your opinion or someone else opinion about me, cos you/they didn't even know me and are just rando people on the internet, anyway I wish you the best luck of the world. 🙏🤞
Mate.. we are in 2024.. 17 years olds can't be groomed anymore, I wouldn't be surprised if she have been with more men than he with women at this point. Children nowadays have internet connected devices since they are one year old and internet it's 95% porn.. don't fuck with me.. most parents didn't even know what the fuck their kids do on the internet.. if it was the 50s you will be right but not nowadays..
Because nobody has ever been led astray by information on the internet. It's all full of truth and only has good things on it. Certainly couldn't affect a young mind to persuasion.
Not defending that MF at all, I'm didn't even republican tbh, but truth it's truth it doesn't matter if he is a fascistoid or a tankie
I must admit that she is definitely young but nowadays a 17 year old girl probably has a lot more sexual experience than a 35 year old man, let's be honest.
Which you clearly know, because you're a 17 year old girl, right? If not, please do explain in detail how you know so much about the sexual habits of teenage girls. Go on, we're listening.