You're viewing a single thread.
Ive seen this exact joke with another monster
61 0 ReplyCongrats, you've just discovered internet memes.
24 1 ReplyBut this one make more sense because Tanith keeps her word and goes from "would" to "did"
19 3 ReplyDoes that count if it was before she had a hongri snek boi she was fattening up to have as a pre-made sausage?
5 0 Replygoes from "would" to "did"
How does this work grammatically?
1 0 Reply
Same. Yet another internet comic just blatantly stealing from another one.
12 4 Replyit's a reference to elden ring. That's Tanith and Rickard/the serpent.
33 0 ReplyAnd the original comic was about A biblically accurate angel. They just ripped it off. I posted it elsewhere in this thread.
14 2 ReplyI'd say it's more of a parody/homage, although since the original isn't well-known it needs to be presented along with this one.
20 3 Replythe original isn't well known
This comic got called out immediately by multiple people
5 5 ReplyBut it was called a "rip-off" when it was clearly parodying the original.
7 1 ReplyThat doesn't mean the original isn't well know, just that people often take the worst possible angle.
1 0 Reply
No you haven't...
1 5 Reply
Idk if either of you are aware of this but sometimes, two different people, who have never interacted in any way, can come up with the same idea.
In a world with 8 billion people it's hard to have an original thought and even harder to put that thought out before someone else does.
21 13 ReplyIt's word for word the same comic and the same angles and everything. Stop trying to be a smart-ass if you don't know what you're talking about.
49 3 ReplyIs this the original? Having the "monster" be an angel and labeling the person "monster fucker" makes it actually make sense to me.
12 1 ReplyYep. This comic even has its own know your meme page
15 1 ReplyHarsh to call this a "rip-off", then.
6 3 Reply... because it's obviously ripping it off?
5 3 ReplyA rip-off is something that is copying something else while pretending to be original. This is parodying the original.
6 0 ReplyHow can it be a parody if the original isn't well known?
2 5 ReplyBecause it was clearly known to the artist. This comic doesn't even make sense unless you know both the original and that these are Elden Ring characters.
4 2 Reply
I still don't get the ,,would".
9 0 ReplyIn the OP's comic, it certainly takes longer to figure "would what?"
The original above with the angel has "monster fucker" on the person, so it's a bit easier to deduce, "would fuck"
14 0 ReplyOh. Yeah. But why afraid?
1 0 ReplyThe dragon (and the angel) doesn't want to be seen as someone that a silly human would want to fuck, so it's "you're supposed to be afraid enough of me that you won't want to have sex with me"
1 0 Reply
Would have sex
10 0 ReplyKind of a meme to say that when you are looking at someone you would fuck
2 0 Reply
10 1 ReplyHe's setting expectations appropriately with that shirt, what more do you want?
3 0 Reply
That's not what happens when people use the same word bubbles or images and change them.
8 0 Reply
Meta
1 2 ReplyMeta is self-reference, not just any reference
2 0 Reply