Sigilos @ BrazenSigilos @ttrpg.network

Posts

16

Comments

198

Joined

2 yr. ago

Sounds like someone thinks there is only one choice, buy or don't.

🏴‍☠️Harhar! 🏴‍☠️

Might need to make the location change to Pennsylvania Ave for a greater effect.

The slut approaches!

That was due in large part to the fully suited scenes being cut from the orginal show. The characters we know in the English version are really a separate cast.

I see why you choose that method then. I only need to build for forklifts going through large bay doors, so I'm afraid I can't give good advice for the constraints you have.

Switch to 2x4, make sure the ones on the bottom (known as 'runners') are standing on edge. Then use 3" coarse thread screws to attach the slats. We build them like that at my workplace to ship and store drums of material that are 1600 - 8000 lbs per pallet. So unless your machines are more then 2000lbs per square foot, you should be fine. The important part is to mark the center of gravity, NOT the center of the machine. As long as the pallet is lifted at CoG, it should move around just fine.

... wtf did I just look at?

I mean it's funny but I could not tell anyone why. And so I'm amused and confused all at once....

I mean i get that is a parody of an orgy, but honestly it's so alien that's the only similarity I can find. I just don't have any personal context for the mechanics of sex positions that wet floor signs might be using. Is there any sort of correlation to type of sign and gender, or is it more of a 'different body type' deal?

I feel like this could be the topic of a whole episode of Lower Decks.

Quick summary here;

Lots of people, mostly under 25 from the looks of them, threw buckets of popcorn all over when the Chicken Jockey appeared. The movie was paused by the theater and identified offenders where escorted out.

Honestly people, just control yourselves. This is a kids movie, for crying out loud. It really screams "look at me, I'm a rebel and cool!" in only the most desperate way. I'm glad none of this happened at my local theater, we all just got to enjoy the film and share a laugh or two.

I mean, that comparison might not be wrong...

I was born at the start of the '90s, and I only got 1 point.

I agree, the nature of the convictions should be a factor. I also agree that a sort of "cooldown" from a conviction would be reasonable, before having eligibility for holding political office restored. I've been leary of the simplified "convicts shouldn't hold office" statement though, since the original intention of that lack of disqualification criteria was, to my understanding, to prevent political imprisonment from barring opponents from holding office. That seems like the sort of thing the current administration would jump on if they could, as well.

I don't have an issue with a public servant holding office and having a criminal record. People make mistakes, and people can change. However, I think the fact the current president has made public and copious comments about dismantling the democracy that exists while showing a blatant disdain for the rights of people, that I have an issue with.

I have Finch set to auto-update, so I'm not sure if it gives you separate notifications for that.

Finch is pretty close. Free as well. It's intended to help with self care and mental wellness, could be a good fit for you.

My friends and family are feeling stirs of panic, and it has pushed many of us to start taking a more active role in making our voices heard. Letter campaigns to Congress, joining activist groups and participating in those groups, and a much higher level of alertness towards government action are just a few of the more obvious results and changes I've seen.

I fear that it won't be enough, but with young kids in our household we are trying to do what we can in nonviolent ways. The risk of prison or worse would take a huge toll on the little ones.

The problem arises when the person giving those orders authority hears "By order of the king" instead of "by directive of the president".

The US doesn't want a king, it was a big deal here about 250 years ago. Looking like it's gonna be a big reminder for the 250 anniversary.

Those look like rams to me

NO. KINGS.

Unless they're in the same stall, no privacy is being violated. And if they are in the same stall, that's a whole different matter anyway.

No reasonable person would be bothered by this, only these fascists and their ilk.

Why else would the orange be challenging the constitution? His current play of changing birthright citizenship is a practice range so he knows how to aim at his real targets.