"I'm not going tonwaste time talking to somebody who thinks politicians can pick who endorses them"
The appropriate response to Cheney endorsing you is to publicly plan a new Nuremberg.
Lol I'd bet 90% of that is of equal quality to the code you get by measuring lines written.
Another 9% is likely stolen.
The final 1% won't even compile, doesn't work right, or needs so much work you'd be better off redoing it.
The only useful result I've had with CS is asking for VERY basic programs that I have to then check the quality of. Besides that, I had ONE question that I knew would be answered in a text book somewhere, but couldn't get a search hit about. (I think it was something about the most efficient way to insert or sort or something like that.)
Worked with it a bit at work and the output was so unreliable I gave up and took the best result it gave me and hard coded it so I could have something to show off. Left it as a "in the future..." thing and last I heard its still spinning in the weeds.
Excellent long-ish video: https://youtu.be/eUywI8YGy0Y
He has a follow up about induction woks. The short: Induction is just as good as if not better then gas for actually moving heat from the stovetop to your food.
Excellent long-ish video: https://youtu.be/eUywI8YGy0Y
He has a follow up about induction woks. The short: Induction is just as good as if not better then gas for actually moving heat from the stovetop to your food.
I'm going to disengage from this and go clean up my brain. I hope you have a good day and weekend, comrade.
I'm trying to think of how to phrase a real response but I can't. I do want to be clear that no "misandry" as redditor-types say isn't real.
Its just incredibly frustrating to feel dogpiled over what I feel is a confusion in the use of a word.
This is just as childishly mean as someone mocking women over a hot flash. Denigrating someone for a biologically uncontrollable phenomena IS sexist.
Because they are reactionary themselves and/or do not actually care about anything.
Its gonna hurt a lot of people directly related to the "computing industry" (haha i'm in danger) but I don't see it effecting the average person.
My company has its fingers in a lot of pies overall. The most we're doing "ai" is basically advanced parsing of data. The type of stuff that the average joe would never see ultimately. If the llm beasts decided to die tomorrow, then we'd have to reassign like 3 people. In an organization with at least 10 teams of 4+ people. In a company with thousands and thousands of employees. And specifically, we're the type of company that IF it were to collapse, average joe would 100% hear about it and be effected in a somewhat meaningful way.
Bit idea: Guy who believe code is law, but only if written by prophets on golden tablets (no you cannot see them).
Honestly its one of the better things tech bros have done. Unicode seems to be extremely liberal with what it'll include. Its been a bit historically biased (adding fake languages a la klingon before real, actually currently used scripts). But they're at least trying and providing what I hope is real support to linguists and those of us who just like to see how other people do scripts.
I'd respect the VC grift of "rich people give us way too much money and we do nothing with it and become moderately well off" if it didn't cause so much damage.
Like, its basically the idea of paying people to do stuff that might not be "productive" but gets them to try things out. But there is no oversight, no regulation, no incentive to care what happens as a result in 3 years time, let alone 50. We should be doing it, but with like restaurants and FOSS programmers and engineers. Move landscapers to public lands to clear out invasives. Move the spacex dorks to nasa and work on an actual 50 year plan to get men on mars in an actually smart way. Have the 'AI' dorks actually work to resolve problems that COULD be solved with neural nets/LLMs. Pay them to just do something weird and unique that might not be the "best" but employs them and offers something unique to the community.
Instead, its ultimately grift, useless movement of capital and resources to appear as growth, fumbling about blindly hoping to hit the next dotcom bubble. Real "Useless jobs" when actually productive meaningful work exists, with the same skills that these people have, but isn't "good" enough for the demons of capitalism to invest in.
Funny, I was going to say Americans probably know what a cabbage is because of slaw.
If elected president, I will do nothing but push for a phonetic alphabet.
Whole lot of effort to convey the idea of "We're going to meet up, go to some guys house to harass them, then if they say no, go get a lawyer".
American, with vested material interest in the status quo.
It can't fucking happen fast enough for me to be happy.