❤️
Colombia
Totally agree, although I would say "... the vast majority of people who went from rags to riches were self-obsessed assholes at at least one part of their life".
Also, the formula Pressure = density x R x T doesn't show that pressure decreases as temperature decreases, since a temperature decrease also increase the density?
But clearly, on a global scale, the opposite is true? As in, for example, the ITCZ is located at the subsolar point, where the planet receives the most irradiation, and this is an area of low pressure (and convection)? High temperatures -> low pressure.
I also heard this.
The way it is taught in many Earth Science text books, is that if you have two similar volumes of air, but the first is colder than the second, the first will have a higher density, and therefore a larger mass, and therefore a higher air pressure (e.g. at the surface).
Following this logic, you expect higher pressure in colder areas, as long as the volume of air (the height of the air column) is the same. I think the answer to my question has to do with the latter: the atmosphere is less thick at the poles. As a result, despite the much lower temperatures, the air pressure at the poles is generally lower than (for example) at the subtropical highs.
Looking at https://zoom.earth/maps/pressure/
Given the much lower temperatures at the poles, I would expect the pressure to be (much) higher.
I'm reading here and there that air pressure at the antarctic is low because of its high altitude, but these maps show (I presume?) MSLP?
No unfortunately I simply bought it in a shop in the Netherlands. And forgot the name.
What are the most important "points of control" that, in the case of Bluesky, are in the hands of this one company, and in the case of Mastodon (or the Fediverse at large?), are in the hands of the community?
It appears that on Bluesky, similar to Mastodon, you can start your own server by now. But on Bluesky you're not (yet) able to have other users sign up to that server? And you can't have your own moderation rules on your own server (yet)?
If I would start my own Bluesky server, and a friend does as well, would our ability to communicate be somehow still at the mercy of choices by the Bluesky company?
What is the practical difference between the AT protocol being controlled by a (public benefit) corporation, and it being controlled by a web standards body?
Disclaimer: I'm not a secret Bluesky fanboy. I just want to have the arguments ready to convince friends to not join Bluesky, and join Mastodon instead.
Reading this article, and especially the end ...
> CEO Jay Graber told The Verge that the plan is to hand over control of the AT protocol to a web standards body like the Internet Engineering Task Force.
... it almost sounds as if Bluesky is (going to be) as community-run as Mastodon.
But I'm suspicious. What is the catch?
Amazing. That appears to be spot on! I was using Obsidentify and that one didn't have a clue. And yes, very cool name indeed.
