LenonLemonLenin [they/them] @ LenonLemonLenin @hexbear.net

Posts

13

Comments

42

Joined

2 yr. ago

It should be real though

Unironically just ban all cis men. That would solve most of it

Why wouldn't that also repel trans women?

That angry about a weird interpretation of a film?

That is a good point

Love when ignorant westerners apply western race relations to parts of the world where that doesn't apply

The patronization is right on cue

Which Latin American socdem besides Morales said something like that?

I think they were adored because they were mostly good art, in whatever sense that means. And I think there's much better criteria to judge a book than it's overt political ideology.

Check out Engels's letter to the socialist writer Margaret Harkness, who critiques her work for its lack of realism and praises the conservative writer Balzac

I am far from finding fault with your not having written a point-blank socialist novel, a “Tendenzroman” [social-problem novel. DM], as we Germans call it, to glorify the social and political views of the authors. This is not at all what I mean. The more the opinions of the author remain hidden, the better for the work of art. The realism I allude to may crop out even in spite of the author’s opinions. Let me refer to an example. Balzac, whom I consider a far greater master of realism than all the Zolas passés, présents et a venir [past, present and future], in “La Comédie humaine” gives us a most wonderfully realistic history of French ‘Society’, especially of le monde parisien [the Parisian social world], describing, chronicle-fashion, almost year by year from 1816 to 1848 the progressive inroads of the rising bourgeoisie upon the society of nobles, that reconstituted itself after 1815 and that set up again, as far as it could, the standard of la viellie politesse française [French refinement]. He describes how the last remnants of this, to him, model society gradually succumbed before the intrusion of the vulgar monied upstart, or were corrupted by him; how the grand dame whose conjugal infidelities were but a mode of asserting herself in perfect accordance with the way she had been disposed of in marriage, gave way to the bourgeoisie, who horned her husband for cash or cashmere; and around this central picture he groups a complete history of French Society from which, even in economic details (for instance the rearrangement of real and personal property after the Revolution) I have learned more than from all the professed historians, economists, and statisticians of the period together. Well, Balzac was politically a Legitimist; his great work is a constant elegy on the inevitable decay of good society, his sympathies are all with the class doomed to extinction. But for all that his satire is never keener, his irony never bitterer, than when he sets in motion the very men and women with whom he sympathizes most deeply - the nobles. And the only men of whom he always speaks with undisguised admiration, are his bitterest political antagonists, the republican heroes of the Cloître Saint-Méry, the men, who at that time (1830-6) were indeed the representatives of the popular masses. That Balzac thus was compelled to go against his own class sympathies and political prejudices, that he saw the necessity of the downfall of his favourite nobles, and described them as people deserving no better fate; and that he saw the real men of the future where, for the time being, they alone were to be found - that I consider one of the greatest triumphs of Realism, and one of the grandest features in old Balzac. (emphasis added)

Dude has clearly not heard of structural-functionalism then

You can also beat the games while watching the video

They hate to see a gay man winning

The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics

A Thousand Plateaus

The Birth of the Clinic

Image/Music/Text

Speech and Phenomena

The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures

Speculum of the Other Woman

Epistemology of the Closet

Kissinger's death brought back an OG poster lol

I was here

Would a Trump admin have a different U.S. response to the Israel-Palestine conflict? Or would it just be different messaging? Because it seems like Biden has given Netanyahu carte blanche, which Trump probably would have done as well.

We're soon going to see the first actually existing anarcho-capitalism

Whoever funds scientific research determines what science is

Is this a BMF post