People vote for single issues all the time. Sometimes its abortions, the economy, etc. But God forbid people seem disgusted at rewarding genocide and voting for harris. People saw no other option other than to either punish them by voting for the other, 3rd party or not voting at all. I dont blame them.
I do vote in my local elections. I think the problem is actually too much money in politics. The oligarchs support and donate an infinite amount of money to campaigns. That leaves genuine candidates with nothing and little exposure.
I think we should severely limit how much they can donate to campaigns as well as having ranked choice voting, which can help people vote for candidates they like without "throwing" their vote away.
However, the democrats didn't put up kamala against others in a primary for us to vote for. She was simply selected. Moreover, the last time Bernie ran, the democratic party basically sabotaged him. There are deep issues that we need to solve.
The article doesn't mention any issues related to policy, which made a lot of people not vote for the democrats.
What he did do was miniscule. The only good thing that I can think of is some of the student loan forgiveness.
You should already be hopeless considering the current administration is aiding genocide.
Then you should be fair and judge harris in a similar way. For supporting and being a part of genocide.
In what way? Israel already has a free check and a shield to do whatever they want.
Nazi Germany 2.0 is already happening. Palestinians are being genocided as we speak. But it seems their blood is too cheap for you to care.
You're so delusional anyways about your 2.0 world. Don't blame me, blame the democrats for supporting and committing genocide. Maybe do something about that first?
I voted, so keep assuming.
I won't vote for who supports genocide. Trump may not be better in this regard but at least I won't reward to those who already aided in it. Next time they should learn to do better.
Definitely boring dystopia material
Delusional take. I'll see you in 4 years when no genocide occurred here in America.
It should be, not support genocide. Corrected.
No. But at least we punished the democrats and taught them a lesson.
Next time they should actually, you know, not support genocide.
And where am I gloating exactly? I'm simply stating that you shouldn't blame the voters but blame the dems for standing for genocide. Not like if harris was elected it would have been any better for the Palestinians.
To teach that supporting genocide is a red line and not doing anything about it will not get you elected.
The real question is how do you end up in a situation with two terrible candidates that will be happy to commit genocide with no consequences. It's a mutlistep issue.
So you want me to reward holocaust Harris and genocide joe for not doing ANYTHING to stop it? No, I chose to teach them a lesson. Don't blame us. Blame the dems for not doing enough and putting a shit candidate.
One is occupied, in an open air prison, being bombed, no food, no water and no one to aid them. The other may have some of their rights taken. Don't compare the two.