When fusion or fission occurs you get new atoms.
It's Hydrogen that's existed since the universe cooled enough for electrons and protons to make atoms. Seconds after the big bang.
That's most hydrogen.
It's never been fused into heavier elements just still sticking around and caught in the planetary part of the solar system rather than the sun itself. Or any previous suns.
There's some helium like that but most helium was formed inside suns later, and heavier elements all formed later in suns or supernovas.
But the SEO garbage sites active up to 2023 have updated since 2023 to keep up with each other.
So it works really well.
VLC
Exceptions are possible. Money isn't everything for everyone.
If you look at the graph, 0GW.
It's unlikely that the batteries stored power for several days. Highly likely that abundance of solar is the source.
"On 31 December 2009, rather than being fully privatised, the mint ceased to be an executive agency and its assets were vested in a limited company, Royal Mint Ltd. The owner of the new company became The Royal Mint trading fund, which itself continued to be owned by HM Treasury. As its sole shareholder, the mint pays an annual dividend of £4 million to the Treasury, with the remaining profits being reinvested into the mint.[58] In 2015, Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne announced a £20 billion privatisation drive to raise funds, with the Royal Mint being up for sale alongside other institutions including the Met Office and Companies House.[55]"
"Then in 2016, the mint announced plans for Royal Mint Gold (RMG), a digital gold currency that uses blockchain to trade and invest in gold. Operated by CME Group, the technology is to be[out of date?] created by technology companies AlphaPoint and BitGo.[69]"
Bring it back into public ownership. It's been partially privatised and the vultures are extracting what they can.
It's not completely nonsensical for the government to lose a small margy on making currency. It's useful and the harder it is to counterfeit the better.
But both "New Labour" and the Conservatives have a lot to answer for when it comes to our national assets being lost.
Is the internet scarier?
Or is it just millennials and "internet natives" having kids and more of them knowing better what the internet actually is.
I tell people to imagine a public place with everyone in it, the majority wearing masks or costumes. With constantly recording surveillance. Do you take off your mask.
Sure the mask is not perfect protection, and there are areas off to the side where people seem to not be wearing masks. But go ahead and choose a way to keep your kids safe.
The point is is anyone has a use for psychology they should pick someone alive to listen to instead of Freud.
Because it doesn't matter if he got some things right when he got lost things wrong.
But I'm glad we at least agree no one should be using what he says as medicine.
Please read the articles on Wikipedia yourself, they'll be a good starting point for you as they're usually very balanced. Unlike the other material you've read.
You're just being silly now. Urban designers do not have patients.
Victorian is a description of the time period. It is factually accurate. If you want to infer something else from the word Victorian then I can't stop you but you'll be wrong.
"Victorian engineering", "Victorian Science" and "Victorian medicine" will definitely have different connotations.
"Victorian science" has the connotation that, unlike say Darwin, it's not considered part of the modern consensus.
You should not learn Victorian science or medicine in the modern day outside of a history class.
Evidence based medicine that relies on evidence even 50 years old should be re-examined. Let alone 130.
From the article you posted.
"For example, meta-analyses in 2012 and 2013 came to the conclusion that there is little support or evidence for the efficacy of psychoanalytic therapy, thus further research is needed"
"In 2017, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found psychodynamic therapy to be as efficacious as other therapies, including cognitive behavioral therapy"
So low to no effectiveness, trying to reach a low bar of another "treatment" which is in question.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_behavioral_therapy#Criticisms
The fact is Freud is right except in the majority of what he's said and done.
Mental health is health.
If you're practicing medicine and are not medically trained or supervised by someone medically trained you're in the same bracket as quacks.
Quacks who read Freud and implement his Victorian ideas when we know them to be false are a problem.
That's why it's important to discredit old ideas, whoever they're from.
Old mistaken ideas in science are the most credible and often the most harmful pseudoscience.
Freud shouldn't be studied outside of a history class these days.
Ideas of his which have survived scrutiny will still exist. He may get passing mentions. But he really needs to be out of focus in the academic and public perception of the subject.
In general an unsupervised psychologist is not a good thing. Those capable of becoming or having their practice enforced by a psychiatrist have a place.
Those still practicing psychoanalysis with no medical training do not. Especially if they don't recognise that Freud was more often wrong than right.
Psychologists who are academic only are the ones discrediting Freud, or they're peer reviewed and told their wrong themselves.
Mental health has a huge problem with lack of professionalism and regulation in practice.
It would also negate the point of the legislation that means they have to accept stamps in the first place.
You should not have to visit a post office in person or online to post a letter.
There are letter boxes in walking distance. If you've bought a book of stamps everything you need is in your desk.
That's the system we have and it would never be designed by a business that way. But it's a business that's taken on that system alongside the I infrastructure for it.
If you genuinely depend on the post accessibility to it is important. It could be modernised but it was working before, modernisation and cost saving are not the same thing.
Fl. Oz are actually nothing to do with weight. They are volume.
For each fluid oz. use 30 ml
It's only approximate but the official measurements for nutrition actually do it in the US so it's not a real unit anyway anymore.
Stamps no longer have a face value. They are 1st or second class.
As they put up the price each year it's becoming common to buy stamps before the price rise and sell them after.
The margin on the last rise was ~13% on 2nd class stamps, 8% on first class stamps.
13% has been roughly the average every year since 2005.
So you can absolutely buy stamps at less than "face value". Someone who bought them 4 years ago could easily give you a 20% discount and still make a profit.
As stamps are not allowed to expire (or have to be replaced if they do) this is a safe investment.
Royal mail have encouraged this to inflate sales in the short term and are suffering from those valid stamps still being available now with no further revenue.
Taking the face value off stamps is what's caused this problem.
There was never an investment opportunity in buying a 90p stamp that was still worth 90p postage years later.
But buying 1000 2nd class stamps that are always worth 2nd class postage has been an inflation beating purchase.
Or they go close to bust and get renationalised.
If Labour are smart about it they'll keep the USO in place and when it's shown the business isn't profitable take the assets back into public hands at a reasonable price.
The key problem with the new stamps is there's no way for someone to check the validity themselves.
It's also just a barcode, so a fake stamp that gets used with that barcode first doesn't get stopped and the legitimate one does.
There have definitely been some batches where the barcodes have leaked.
Reminds me of striped biologist-taunters.
You don't have to throw out anything. Everything that's right has now been through peer reviewed studies authored by other people.
The problem is most of what Freud said is wrong, you can be a psychoanalyst without a medical degree because it isn't a medical field.
Modern psychiatry is a separate subject and you're happy to defend psychoanalysis and conflate it with psychiatry.
Which would be no different to conflating nutritionists and dietitians, chiropractors and physiotherapists, or, to quote Dara O'Brien, dentists and toothologists.
Hey I'm just checking in with your account status. Definitely just that, not hoping you'll but anything...
All emails companies send you are designed to get you to spend money.
It's an ad.
Of course if that ad comes with a discount I might not be unhappy to get it. But if a(n) status message ad comes in reminding me of pizza and it's on a day they want me to pay full price for dominos. Then I don't want that message.
Either I'll feel hungrier or poorer.
Honestly, Zoom just has a hilariously high frequency of vulnerabilities being discovered.
Let's set the sentence for executing an innocent man to, death.
The first barrier to the death penalty is to make sure verdicts are right 100% of the time.
After that you can begin the debate about **whether it's moral at all.