Skip Navigation
But Arthus is still woke though, he wont say the G@mer word.
  • It wasn't the actress, it was the pants, and them not being flattering.

    The Twitter user nor the post mentioned anything about the actress. Did you see the picture in the post? Or are you just inserting preconceived biases here

  • But Arthus is still woke though, he wont say the G@mer word.
  • You should, but the hexbear mods are picky about what constitutes a valid opinion. I made a comment in another thread about not enjoying the new trend of baggy pants on women, got banned from the thread lol.

    Lucky they agreed with you on this one

  • "We see people are going to want to leave to go make $20 an hour."
  • I don't see anyones pronouns on my feed lol, but in their profile it says "comrade" as a pronoun does it not?

    Anyway, that's a very lib way of arguing - immediately calling people transphobic, even if that's not the issue at hand at all

  • "We see people are going to want to leave to go make $20 an hour."
  • That's not true, I've worked with some train wrecks that kill it. Some are old, some are ugly, and many can really only put on a happy face for 10 seconds at a time.

    The majority of the population is neurotypical, it's a stretch to re-structure the whole system for a very small percentage of folks who aren't. I'd even be willing to guess that many of those people probably don't even want a customer facing job if their social skills are a dumpster fire. Alternatively, these kinds of jobs are good at making you better, social skills wise.

    But if you really don't like any aspect of what you're doing, you're not going to do it well, doesn't really matter who you are

  • "We see people are going to want to leave to go make $20 an hour."
  • Yeah I get where you're coming from, but when you have nights that you pull in $500+ in tips (plus minimum wage), you don't really want to have to go back to minimum wage + nothing. Even with the gamble of the odd asshole not paying.

    Not having a cap on how much you can make that's not based on time, is huge.

  • Italy considers law against sharenting to protect children's privacy
  • There'd be hardly any parents left if you could jail bad parents on whim based on a singular observation.

    Then many of those kids would be even worse off...

    Thinking back to the very "concerned parents" of my childhood, they were usually the over protective lunatics

  • "We see people are going to want to leave to go make $20 an hour."
  • Restaurant owner? Fast food?

    Ya know, if you give really good service at a restaurant you can make a killing as a server/bartender. But if you just want to do mediocre work, I guess $20/hr at fast food sounds enticing

    Kitchen staff being the exception, but I dunno what they're referencing because the article is hidden behind a paywall

  • I'm told that this is a real picture.
  • Your solution to losing is to now bandwagon with "the lesser of two evils"? Why wouldn't you abandon that party entirely? There's more than two choices.

    They'll kill and take away the rights of people who aren't you though...yay...

    To top it off, you go on to bash those who think that's not a good choice

    The irony.

    But don't listen to me, I'm the stupid one.

  • FedNow - how do you all feel about it?

    FedNow appears to be launching July 23, 2023. To me, it doesn't seem very good in the sense that the Fed now gets to be a middle man to payment transactions (sure it's "instant" but we're all aware that security != convenience).

    It's also a "centralized" solution.

    It could be a stepping stone to a centralized digital bank currency is my fear. And also the fed will now be able to see/monitor all transactions through it.

    0
    InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SH
    Shake747 @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    Posts 1
    Comments 226