My point was that it seemed to me as if you were assuming from limited information that the pronunciation was prevalent when the source material provided doesn’t state the prevelence.
“ It can be pronounced…” is not the same as, “Is often pronounced”
Musk: "We've spared no expense!"
Critics: "So, LiDAR?"
Musk: "We've spared some expense!"
"And now you'll have to wonder exactly which surface has the actual finger-prints!"
I'm trying to figure out how someone's request for others to provide additional open-source projects like this, even if cross-posted to an astoundingly vast quantity of two communities, is even remotely problematic. The post doesn't violate either community's rules, invites other posters to continue the discussion with similar resources, and OP has been engaged.
We're going to need a new word for when all this data on your poo leaks.
Bars with parking lots.
But only an apple they’d picked themselves or received from a trusted supplier with legible labeling, since it otherwise might be a potato.
Who’s throwing away perfectly fine food that could be donated? By which I mean, from one’s own home.
“Ugh, I bought two loaves of bread? In the bin with you!”
So now we just need a MAC filter with a wild card at the firewall?
No more LG products in this house.
What’s required in terms of attribution will be subject to the license that can with your SoundFont, sample library, etc.
The legal implication of using any audio acquired in any way will always be subject to the license under which it is acquired.
There are some sources that only allow for use in non commercial productions, plenty allow commercial usage without further attribution necessary, but the exact requirements of using it will always be subject to that license.
Check with the original site, they may have the slice se available.
Every country hacks every other country, and when convenient will claim false flag.
I'm pretty sure it's just an endless series of spiderman pointing at each other.
The old, “I know you are, but what am I?” defense
