He should narrate erotic fiction. Just listen to him oozing raw lust and sex appeal in Congress! 😂
Protectionism is a valid reason to deny it
No it isn't. Protectionism is jingoist bullshit. Always has been, always will be.
I wonder if denying Chinese tech under the guise of national security a last ditch attempt from big oil lobbyists?
Definitely. The leadership of both major US parties are pretty much owned by the fossil fuel industries.
Even progressives advocating for the Green New Deal won't say the part about gradually eliminating fossil fuel use out loud out of fear of fossil fuel industry lobbyists and the politicians they own doing an AIPAC.
Or is that too far fetched
Not at all.
That'll happen when one candidate outspends the other 7 to 1 with the blood money of a fascist apartheid regime currently committing genocide and the endorsement of the establishment.
Taking money from AIPAC isn't any better than taking money from the Russian or Saudi governments.
Pro-Israel Centristgenocide-denying conservative sponsored by the fascist apartheid regime currently committing genocide
There, fixed it for them
See also former progressive Mondaire Jones.
Jones in 2020: "defund the police!" votes to impeach fascist American president
Jones in 2024: "Hooray for the fascist apartheid regime currently committing genocide! So progressive!"
I REALLY wish she'd just shut up and enjoy her long overdue retirement already 😮💨
Fuck your genocide-denying defense of a fascist apartheid regime. You're gleefully on the wrong side of history.
For once, OK is (temporarily) OK? Never thought I'd see the day!
It's an interesting wager that more people hate than not
People in general? Probably not.
Republicans? Definitely.
I don't think it's compatible with the upcoming generations' perspectives, which is why I assume they are investing so much into radicalizing children on social media. More soldiers for the culture war.
Bullseye.
Imagine working for two hours to be able to afford a single fucking Big Mac meal!
Could it be? Is Oklahoma...finally OK, if only temporarily??
Just read it like foghorn leghorn and it works.
Also a good method for making any news featuring that awful senator John Kennedy more life-like.
Yeah I know, was just funnier to pretend that I didn't 😉
All kidding aside, though, you have to try Scandinavian/German style potato salad! That shit is SO good!
follows instructions
I never knew Robert Hays was so limber!
Charlotte did something I couldn't: found a use for my old DVDs and game discs 😁
(CNN) — “Make Europe Great Again” is Hungary’s official motto for its upcoming turn at the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union.
🤦
I also don't appreciate that apparently my opinion doesn't matter, since "I'm not a resident of the EU" is a required field.
Which it of course is because they want to get past common sense EU regulations restricting their ability to infest people's devices with malware.
Industry groups said the E.P.A. had exceeded its authority in requiring the drinking-water cleanup. The chemicals, known as PFAS, are linked to cancer and health risks.
cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/10442645
> Chemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’ > > In practice, this means 3M is continuing to create harm from the risks they spent decades covering up
Conservative-dominated court restores books denounced by officials as ‘pornographic filth’ to school libraries
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16364130
> Appeals court tells Texas it cannot ban books for mentioning ‘butt and fart’ > > Conservative-dominated court restores books denounced by officials as ‘pornographic filth’ to school libraries > > An appellate court has ruled that Texas cannot ban books from libraries simply because they mention “butt and fart” and other content which some state officials may dislike. > > The fifth US circuit court of appeals issued its decision on Thursday in a 76-page majority opinion, which was written by Judge Jacques Wiener Jr and opened with a quote from American poet Walt Whitman: “The dirtiest book in all the world is the expurgated book.” > > In its decision, the appellate court declared that “government actors may not remove books from a public library with the intent to deprive patrons of access to ideas with which they disagree”.