That should've healed by then though

I don't disagree. But I'm pretty sure this was intended to be done on the election year. Don't get me wrong, I will not vote for the orange fuzz ball with a gun to my head. But this could've been done earlier in his term

Thousands. There was a point in time last year or whenever where that number was 100 or 1000 or even 1.

Could've pardoned that person then.

Quick question

Why didn't he do that 3 years ago when he got into office

I like to remind people that the heaviest stones for the pyramids were about 400 tons while a few thousand years later in Lebanon the largest stones for the temple complex in Baalbek are about 1250 tons.

But no one questions that the construction there

I say within 50 years they'll declare it all Israel

You forgot the killings

Here's a link if you want to include in your comment.

It's a site that compares car sizes. This link is for the 3 series

https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/compare/bmw-3-1997-sedan-vs-bmw-3-2018-sedan/

And here's a dodge challenger which surprisingly is fatter but slightly shorter and higher

https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/compare/dodge-challenger-1969-coupe-vs-dodge-challenger-2015-coupe/

Now put in a law saying you can't do that

For uploading game clips I'd assume

I'm giving it to my brother. Or just sell it for $100 to yourself

If someone buys a home that was rented. Would the cap apply to them? Because this might result in a loophole

I completely agree that's what I meant by the 3rd party. Those who will refuse to vote for either and I tend to find that more common from those who would've voted Democrat compared to the ones that would've voted Republican

For us to do so yes. For the government, it constantly breaks the law

Funny-ly enough you can block their signal. Issue is it's also going to block everyone within range

GLBTA? I honestly thought you were spelling something out with that

You're forgetting a decent subset. Ones who are informed but would rather vote 3rd party, which due to not having Teddy Roosevelt won't do shit, rather than vote for either of these guys

I don't think giving ownership to accounts like shares would work. But probably employees owned

I understand for the life of the company. But it's not even my steam account. It's my child's who's currently -5 years old (give or take). I did create it on their behalf a decade ago to redeem the free games on their behalf and gift them games I think they'll enjoy.

Oh I didn't own my steam account it was created for my future children. it's a trust.