I don’t understand why this is relevant. But, to answer your question, a modern system should already be on systemd

Dear lord...I will try to read the rest but you are not off to a good start. What has modern to do with systemd?

I am not sure I understand what you mean by:

Consider checking up on where Wayland, systemd, PipeWire, PulseAudio etc first appeared; so on which particular distro. Are you referring to use those packages as default? Afaik Fedora OS is not even rolling release, so I cannot fathom how it has packages earlier than the typical bleeding-edge candidates. Fedora Atomic Why are you mixing Fedora Atomic with the regular Fedora Distro? It’s also the most mature attempt. Derivatives like Bazzite are the product of this endeavour. From the OG distros, only openSUSE (with its Aeon) has released an attempt. However, it seems to be less ambitious in scope and vision. ...how is something like this objectively valid? I understand you like Fedora, but you make claims without any proof or just pure opinion based.

How does that contradict what I wrote? I even mentioned RHEL...

lol? are you trolling?

Being the first distro on which new technologies are introduced

Also atomic branch? SELinux might be a fair point, but I doubt that ss unique to Fedora tbh.

Fedora has no selling point at all besides being similar to RHEL.

systemd, dbus, and polkitd. If any one of those components are misconfigured, you risk an unauthorized user gaining root privileges.

Just for my own understanding, if any of those are misconfigured, do you not anyway have a big security problem already, regardless of run0?

This is taking way too long.

I mean...all this and much more is part of the wireguard archwiki. And whoever wants to setup a wireguard server but doesn't know what ping is... Interesting would be an example on how to use tcpdump and how to read it.

No.

What prompt is this?

I just glimpsed over the other comments, I also use both Mullvad VPN and tumbleweed. I switched to systemd-resolvd and got it working at some point, but its a big hassle and I also had strange problems when trying it for the first time. I could try to look into my configuration on the weekend.

Or "why would you?"

Changing from arch to fedora was mostly based on his ties with Red Hat. I am still waiting here for ANY REASON for a private person to chose ANYTHING from red hat, without having ties with them. Their documentation is horrid and mostly hidden behind some kind of login bullshit.

Edit: Also the take on KDE "being" bloated. It misses the point. KDE has so many moving cogs that it gets quite hard to fix issues you come across. That is why its "bloated". Nobody is complaining about working features which are useful. But if some window rules are bugging out, good luck fixing that on KDE.

Exactly, native games are dead anyway? :P

Care to elaborate? What have games to do with window decorations?

Just play guild wars 2 if you don't wanna rely on other players.

not enough upvotes

Uhm both displaying copy/move process and having shortcuts for "favourite" dirs is quite possible with nnn. Although for the later I mostly use -S argument for persistent session.

The only drawback of nnn in my book is the kind of weird/cumbersome way to configure it eith ENV variables. And the non-existent preview image display under wayland.

This bug is so old and tbh its a big f*** y** for KDE developement or whoever is responsible for this shitshow called SDDM. Its the reason my desktop pc is running LDM for multiple years now, since I stumbled over this.

But yeah, we need more KDE specific tools tralalala, instead of a working login manager.

But you next, please.