How often are you reading about someone suing and then that lawsuit (which is already in court) being dropped because they got a better offer for an arbitration/settlement out of court? For me that's a very common thing to read for bigger cases.
But I agree that forced arbitration with not even a chance to take it to court if you don't like the offer is horrible for the consumer
Arbitration doesn’t save money. You still need lawyers.
of course - but usually it's way faster than getting a proper court-ruling - and since lawyers are paid per hour that makes a big difference
Isn't it often in both parties to settle things out of court? For the one that'd sue it's usually more money at less cost and the company gets around possibly having a bad precedent set and the bad publicity to potentially losing in court.
This is probably aimed at people creating issues in the hopes of getting a settlement for something that has a slim (but Nonzero) chance to hold up in court.
It's a company - I think this aims at people only bringing serious claims and reducing the paperwork for them - but since it's Valve people will glorify everything they do
Aber genau das will Habeck doch auch? Dass da so ein gelber Troll im Finanzministerium sitzt und das alles blockiert wodurch man gucken muss dass man noch einen bestmöglichen Kompromiss hinbekommt hat doch nicht Habeck zu Verschulden?
Manchmal Frage ich mich echt was diese Fundamentalpositionen eigentlich erwarten was passiert wenn man in einer Koalition ist?
Anonymous usually means that they don't want their name to show up publicly.
There's almost certainly knowledge of who that money is coming from at least with a couple of persons that received the funds.
So someone donates money to their city's library with the specific purpose that they can expand their building to have more space that's a bribe?
Should it? I get that political parties should report donors - but for nonprofits and other institutions I feel it's not that necessary since they are directly investing that money in projects (that the donor may choose - but if that's not the case then that investment isn't happening) - for political parties and politicians it can be seen as a bribe as the things they invest in usually don't have a direct return of investment.
And there should be rules and regulations making sure that that donation is not ending up in some kind of contract for the company of the donor but that whatever that investment is funding has a transparent process
Where do we draw the line? Should donors to libraries be made public even if that person wants to remain anonymous but fund an expansion? Should donors to non-profits be made public?
Ist schon schwierig
Katzen drinnen halten ist mMn schon fast Tierquälerei - frei draußen rumlaufen lassen ist aber leider extrem schädlich für den Vogelbestand...
That guy legitimately made his hobby into his job.
There's 0 reasons for him to still keep updating the game with as much content as he's doing except for his own satisfaction. Truly the best developer a game can have
I only look at 1 star reviews for that reason and decide if the problem those people have if relevant for me or in general
I mean AMD heavily relies on Taiwan being independent to even be the company they are. If China takes over most people in power and all the shareholders are fucked - so in this instance it actually makes sense even from a company standpoint to do malicious compliance
ja nur haben die anderen Parteien das beim Klimaschutz (leider) begriffen und besetzen das Thema jetzt ausschließlich negativ - aber bei der Migration geht's immer schön mit Anlauf weiter in Richtung AfD-Rethorik weil man da einfach nicht draus lernen will...
Das Gesetz müsste dann verändert werden.
Und wenn das nicht passiert?
Also in meinen bisherigen Beziehungen war es immer anders herum - ich bin vielleicht alle 2 Jahre mal so krank dass es mich total aus der Bahn haut aber sonst gesund (wenn auch mit fast permanent laufender Nase im Winter) und meine Freundinnen sind alle 3-4 Monate so krank gewesen dass sie nicht arbeiten konnten.
Klar nur anekdotisch aber ich hatte eher das Gefühl in meinem Umkreis dass es Frauen häufiger erwischt aber meist nicht so schwer (vielleicht auch einfach nur deutlich höhere Toleranz gegen Schmerzen und Unwohlsein durch die Regelblutung)
Jo - nur was passiert dann wenn die sagen dass das illegal war? Beugehaft gegen einen C.L.?
Ist die Polizei nicht dem Innenministerium unterstellt? Wer würde das durchsetzen?
Ich finde es so frustrierend wie sich bei der letzten Wahl alle Parteien mit Klimaschutz überboten haben und dann gesehen haben dass das ja nur den Grünen Wählerstimmen bringt weil die das als Kernthema haben und dann konsequent aufgehört haben dass Thema zu bespielen um nicht noch mehr Wähler zu verlieren, dass man aber bei Migration immer noch nicht kapiert dass das am Ende auch nur Leute zur AFD bringt wenn man sich da gegenseitig überbietet.
