Why are we not using them in end-user devices

Bad photographers complaining to be called out as bad photographers.

World of Goo!

Their distribution of books is completely legal.

Corporations just have more money to warp the laws in their favour.

That's why the Archive is appealing: they still believe they are right.

Wikipedia requires attribution, which AI scrapers never give.

It is "public" work, but under a license.

Then maybe it shouldn't grow.

It seems a very valid reason to give up your privacy.

You could present your valid argument without calling in homophobia.

Hungary will have the presidency, not the total control. They propose discussions but the vote in the Council is still majority based.

The second sentence of OP should have started with "Scientific research"

It's brigading when you don't like their opinion.

The only way to beat fatphobia is to become obese.

This community sidebar clearly states:

Be warned:

• Anon is often crazy.
• Anon is often depressed.
• Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Go vote what left parties in your country think about it. It's likely the same.

Which features do the lack?

Doesn't it seem that this problem is caused by Google not operating the markets in the same way?

Why would you import used devices from the US in the first place? People sell them in Europe too.

What convinces you of that?

You are right, it's not allowed in the FIFA World Cup. I didn't know.

Not everyone wants to deal with that (setting up payment methods, filling tax forms, …)

So you wish that all corporations shouldn't pay their developers at all, because MIT licence exists?