Good explanation.
This has the interesting implication that the relative speed between the portals is "added" to whatever goes through it.
Example: the blue portal is on a train running with the same speed in opposite direction. The people-bundle would instantaneously be accelerated to twice the speed of each of the trains. (This becomes a real headscratcher if you were able to put the portals in a particle accelerator)
Oh I'm sorry
it can save you a lot of heart ache
*headache
Was probably what you meant
Thanks for the correction - This still needs clarification though. I'd argue that calling it "government funded" is the better mental model and "financed by the audience it is answerable to" is giving the false impression that the audience has any influence on what they are paying for and consuming - AFAIK they don't
The BBC is publicly funded, yes. The fee is however set by the government and accepted by the parliament, in which ususally the ruling coalition (or party) holds the majority, so its effectively set by the ruling party. This does make it technically different from direct state funding but de-facto the gov still has controll over the amount of funding the BBC will receive.
So while the audience pays directly it does not have the ability to pull or increase funding in approval or disapproval but the government does.
Like you said nominally the BBC is answerable to the audience, de-facto it is answerable to the government only.
Other publicly funded broadcasters have a different system, in Germany for example the federal states decide on the licence fee.
However de-facto this doesn't change anything. Its common knowledge in Germany that the publicly funded broadcasters are quite state affiliated, there have been a couple of court rulings confirming that.
So yeah for a bigger picture looking at funding only isn't sufficient
Its good to be dubious. Its also good to include them to get a different bias into the mix. Only consuming media of the same bias will leave you ignorant without you knowing it, thats the believe I've come to adopt.
And you only realize which part of the bias is shared across a lot of media when you read media from outside the bubble. And a lot are within the bubble. To quote wikipedia:
progressively fewer individuals or organizations control increasing shares of the mass media.
There is enough reason to be dubious about all mass media. BBC is founded and owned by the UK government and many other publications by a billionaire family.
Previously I had thought media literacy was about chosing "reliable" sources but nowadays I believe its more about reading many of different biases and being dubious of all until their bias emerges.
IDK if that resonates with you at all or not. But I can also recommend Noam Chomskys "Manufacturing Consent", its a classic ofc.
Someone else and not an expert. But Maybe types are implemented with Monads, Maybe is a common monad.
Its how rust does error handling for example, you have to test a return value for "something or nothing" but you can pass the monadic value and handle the error later, in go you have to handle the error explicitly (almost) all the time.
Children for the rich / eugenics for the poor.
Inhumane and monstrous.
But at least capitalism would finally implode after the rich realize without exploitation of the workers they got rid of the backbone of their society
Emacs was always the superior program since it was released by Richard Stallman in 1985.
Easily agreed.
That being said I can't go back from my meow modal keybindings
Ppl put a lot of thought in their rage bait these days
Shit I wouldn't say unwatchable but I was greatly disappointed and think the praise it has gotten was unjustified.
Their first movie "Swiss Army man" was original, edgy and deep
EEOAO was well done, but it was neither of those three. It was a longer, less creative, real-life Rick and Morty episode if you ask me.
I wouldn't know I am just a CPC shill I am not concerned with questions unrelated to Xi.
But if you're looking for John Connor it's that guy 👇
Ich erinnere mich, das war eine der wenig wirklich guten Nachrichten dieses Jahr ✊
Weiß jemand ob die eine Schwesterpartei in D haben?
Tankiehaft russlandnah
Schwierig zu sagen da beides Kampfbegriffe sind, man müsste es definieren
Ich persönlich würde sie so oder so wählen (wenn ich könnte) sie sind glaubwürdiger als so ziemlich alle anderen Politiker (beispielsweise limitieren die Abgeordneten ihre Bezüge freiwillig am durchschnittsgehalt eines facharbeiters) und treten für eine vertretbare politik ein.
Dude, take a break!
I mean I completely disagree with you, but this thread can't be healthy for you. What purpose is it serving to get enraged here?
I'd say take a breather and if you dare: ask yourself how reliable your impression of China really is, maybe research some older claims that have been proven to be misrepresented or false, like this for example. Not saying you have to become a fan, but there seems to be a propaganda effort to prepare the public for a economic/military war with China. So more people need to be sceptical.
You seem to haven't accepted it yet, but the capitalist class, through the means of communication they control, construct most impressions you have of foreign countries (without them being able to interject) and facts are negligable as they have been in the news-medias support of every US war effort in history as well.
I got a little carried away, but I meant it in good faith, you decided to wear a badge of socialism after all.
What you do is obviously up to you!
Dude, on lemmy consent is just not as heavily manufactured by capital interest as on other platforms.
Its the absence of bots you're experincing and possibly some withdrawal symptoms.
All good we're here for you, one doesn't get off of propaganda easily
The post itself is dumb, so I wouldn't complain about dumb comments
Tbh, I find the hexbears quite refreshing👌
I have BraveNewPipe which has the sponsorblock patch too but allows me to follow Greenwalds system update on rumble