They still emmit the most, let's see how satellite evidence will change over time.

sus

Yeah this really was a wild moment

Yeah the problem I see with this argument is that of course in an idealised world it would make sense to ban parts of the internet just like banning some kinds of oppinions is based irl.

But I think on the internet is a lot of garbage that has to be there so that people see it, because without allowing some garbage there is no discussion, no new values nor freedom.

I think any kind of left leaning ideology should enable non violent discourse as much as possible. Of course that would mean banning really bad things, but it would not mean complete restriction.

Also as a side note: Banning something does not kill the presence of it in society. In most cases it makes the issue worse than it is: You need more than just a ban, you need to convince people that you're right, not force them into beliving.

This is why fact based propaganda is valuable and a great way to stop populism.

Ok then show me why.

How should I know where somebody is and if you really feel trapped by your location, don't try not to use force to escape, since any kind of violence is justified at that point.

And you're not doing it. Why? Because you don't fucking have to run like many people on the world right now do, because you still do find some kind of rest the way you are trapped.

You got two choices: Either you just carry on and stop commenting such nonsense just to make me angry or you can violently escape and disrupt US capitalism as much as you want which would be based, comrade.

Also on a side note in general for anybody reading, I just think that spraying "western propaganda" on anything you don't like is entitled.

I sure as hell know that I don't know anything, but I know that I don't know enough to say that I do and this is why on toppics like NK and so on I don't trust anybodies oppinion if it is not peer reviewed by multiple not related sources.

Ok insane internet person.

You really just want to make me mad, nothing else. What kind of fucked up way to live is that.

I just wanted to say that eventhough it sucks here I am still embracing my liberties to comment on any post with any oppinion as long as it does not directly hurt somebody.

How deranged must somebody be to not recognise this right?

(spoiler warning about berserk after the golden age arc)

I'd say femto would win against lara croft, because he literally is invulerable to all physical damage, when he gets reborn, he becomes much stronger but also becomes vulnerable at one day in a month, so if she is careful, she can kill him easily, if we say that he is alone (and zodd is not watching from afar like in berk)

Some time ago I heard that the anarchist cookbook is not recommended and one should use CIA instructions to manufacture improvised explosives etc.

Ok, if you all love north korea then why not live in it?

Fun fact: If you do, you'll won't be able to comment here, because they don't allow shit on their internet there in NK, China or Ruissia.

Yeah this guy is nuts. In their comments under that post you can even see that they don't understand anything about how your decision making changes when you grow up, which is precisely why underage can not consent.

This guy is either a child themselves (is themself a thing, lol?) or they just lack proper judgment, which is why people like them should be educated or should touch some grass next time they want to post a garbage take.

Fun fact: did you know that apple juice and other fruity drinks are a major cause of diabetes for children?

We forget sometimes how much sugar there is in it. Sugar is always unhealthy, and getting addicted in any way to it is bad.

Ngl the character design is so fucking good in this gen.

Average AI prompt response be like

Nah, in 9/11 there died many innocent people (the event itself + the unjustified war after that), "just" hack wallstreet and/or blow up lots of American pipelines and you have more damage to those that deseve it than a 9/11.

I don't belive that reeducation camps are something bad. I mean we do it all the time with people that are too dangerous for society like mass murderes or rapists.

I just think that there is no reason for violence in this.

We can just do it like school does: In my 12 years of primary education I have been taught that you should behave as capitalistic as you can be: We even had a lecture called "economy and politics" where we mostly talked about how to inverst or on how to start your own buissness. The only "politics" we had were west-centric post WW2 propaganda in which they told us how good the west has been for my country: Germany.

And the dumb thing is that in every country there is you can study this lecture basically at the university. Here it's called "Betriebswirtschaftslehre" which would more or less be "Buissness administration" . This is a lecture that talkes about economy with the following premises: The human is evil, won't share, aka Communism bad Captalism good.

And this really is the go to education for most people here that either suck at learning (because it's easy) or don't know what to study.

Thanks this is literally the first answer that helps. I actually did know from a leaked CIA document that there even were democratic processes in Stalin's time.

What I don't like that much about Mao is this propaganda reducation camps or something like that.

(read my other comment pls)

huh? I am literally just trying to understand and see your points but ok, if you want to make fun of me, then you're not even really trying to show me what my mistake is.

I don't get how doing what is so obviously good makes you a good leader, that just makes the west bad because they basically helped hitler. Also this "we are in their dept thinking isn't really a productive argument.

Why can people just admit that there are some truths and not everything was good.

Communism is not an ideology that can be done by just reading a basic rulebook and blindly believing historic anecdotes that are hard to verify or just straight up wrong.

I also want to believe that there were good and powerful communist leaderships, I can understand that.

How does wanting to understand make me a lib? Isn't this kind of flagging people what left ideologies criticise?

Just give me some real facts or evidence and I am happy, if you can't show me these you are reactionistic and conter-revolutionary.