tee9000 @ tee9000 @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

281

Joined

10 mo. ago

I refuse to believe people are that dumb

I dont need my OS to be a challenge or a flex.

ASSETTO CORSA

This... comment... its not a meme or a trope. I feel... l dont know what to feel or what to say. Can you please convert this to an image with text or at least make your comment seem like you are 100% certain about who needs to die??

Lemmy.

If you are making them aware they will fail by not reading the documentation, then its surprising they would continue to put that off. Using chatgpt is different than only being able to use chatgpt. Then again i was a kid once and kind of get it. Maybe banning it is the better option, as you say.

I thought it was scary enough when instructors would do "locked down" timed tests with short/essay answers. I cant imagine students thinking they'd be fine using chatgpt for stuff theyll need to applicably demonstrate.

I wonder if the drop out rate will increase for colleges due to stuff like this, or if students are majoring in more technical stuff more due to llm overconfidence.

Thanks for your responses!

Im asking about this individuals experience as a ta, not for an opinion on llms.

Oh interesting that they wouldnt need or want to hide that. When i use it i interpret every line of code and decide if its appropriate. If that would be too time consuming then i wouldnt use an llm. I would never deviate from the assignment criterion or the material covered by deferring to some obscure methodology used by an llm.

So i personally dont think its been bad for my education, but i did complete a lot of my education before llms were a thing.

Dont you guys test the students in ways to punish the laziness? I know you are just a ta, but do you think the class could be better about that? Some classes ive taken are terribly quality and all but encouraged laziness, and other classes were perfactly capable of cutting through the bullshit.

How do you know if it doesnt benefit a student? If their work is exceptional, do you assume they didnt use an LLM? Or do you not see any good code anymore?

Pavlov VR

I dont know what you are even trying to say

Is that better or worse?

History is watching you fly a military escort to the amazon and back for a photo op you dip

So they are moving away from general models and specializing them to tasks as certain kind of ai agents

It will probably make queries with those agents defined in a narrow domain and those agents will probably be much less prone to error.

I think its a good next step. Expecting general intelligence to arise out of LLMs with larger training models is obviously a highly criticized idea on Lemmy, and this move supports the apparent limitations of this approach.

If you think about it, assigning special "thinking" steps for ai models makes less sense for a general model, and much more sense for well-defined scopes.

We will probably curate these scopes very thoroughly over time and people will start trusting the accuracy of their answer through more tailored design approaches.

When we have many many effective tailored agents for specialized tasks, we may be able to chain those agents together into compound agents that can reliably carry out many tasks like we expected from AI in the first place.

I would hope that PCVR would at least be merged with the standalone population and their experience enhanced with more computing power as possible. But yeah the demanding native PCVR games might only exist with merged flatscreen populations (simulators), be a singleplayer experience, or cease to have a multiplayer population when/if standalones mature and dominate the market.

But everyday devices like glasses wont be used for games. And standalone gaming hmds will always be balancing between processing power and form factor (weight/size) because we will always want to push the performance boundary.

I would love to concede to standalone device for the user population benefit if there was a computing puck or something that wirelessly transmitted to a very lightweight hmd... i dont like wearing a computer when it could be lighter.

I like that the success of VR was acknowledged as a pretty arbitrary benchmark.

For me, it means being able to hop on games and join a robust multiplayer community that doesnt "need your support"... its just available. But im obviously talking about gaming exclusively.

I dont think theres going to be a lot of overlap between gaming and augmented reality for everyday use due to hardware limitation versus form factor. Glasses wearers wont be able to run games well, and gaming hmds wont be comfortable/fashionable enough to wear around. If this is ever possible it wont be in the foreseeable future. They seem like very different markets with different expectations of a product.

VR gaming needs to get more comfortable, faster/seamless/glitch free loading screens, and compelling/engaging content.

When VR gaming can offer better long term experiences than beat saber and gorilla tag... something that engages long term (progression) and combines the social experience then people will buy headsets for that game and standalone VR gaming will be more than an experiment.

Its frustrating that such a game is possible but hasnt been done yet.

Facebook memes... nice.

No, not at all.

There have also been failures at a rate that would make human space flight concerning. Why wouldnt more experience be better? You are saying we didnt learn anything about space flight with each mission?

I dont know what mars coin is. Why do you generalize my appreciation for spaceflight to other unrelated opinions? Im not a group of people, im an individual who you know nothing about. Stop with the weird guessing of my beliefs.

Lemmy commenter used layman heuristics!

Lemmy commenter missed!