2010, simply because of how english works.
If you say 2001 as twenty one, it's confusing. Same goes all the way up to "twenty nine".
And it's more garbled and slower to say "twenty oh one" vs "two thousand one", especially if you're speaking quickly.
"Twenty ten" and up, however, starts making sense as a different piece of information and can be used easily.
Oh good. I'm sure glad the author took a step back to consider the voting demographics of the latest election instead of using a sexist and racist argument.
How useful.
Fuckin called it.
Fuck off and read the gd article, asshole
Can I have some of whatever you're on?
Well, this is all very subjective. Idk what you do for a living, but there are massive differences between fact to fact communication and IM/email.
To say it's outdated is just insane and flat wrong.
Not quite, this has happened before
Lotta them exist. Always have and always will. This is how you begin the "have and have not" groups.
To your first point, why? You know what the Internet is like outside the fediverse right?
To your second, I guess you can. Don't know what it has to do with the subject at hand
Idk, you tell me. I'm suggesting that scarce resources not owned by anyone will get used by those who take it. This is a fact. What then? Is it bad? Is it ok? Pretending it's not a thing is to deny reality and all of human/life history
That's the thing though: someone will. That's what regulations, ownership (collective or individual), and laws are for. That's why it's not a simple thing.
What if one person comes in and takes it all? Don't even need companies, just individuals.
That's the tragedy of the commons.
I mean, yeah...one of them is an attempt at a solution for the tragedy. It's a logical step to protect things from others ruining it by saying it's yours.
Presumably because everyone assumes the tragedy of the commons will happen as it always does. And, little red hen, there's a sense that if one person does the work, they are owed the fruits of their labor
I cannot tell if you are being serious or just having fun with buzzwords
Where did I say anything about Jews not living there continuously? Idk what you're talking about now
I'm not sure the point you're trying to make..I was just pointing out that "voluntarily leaving what is now Israel" is wildly misleading and wrong