Major papers are giving Trump’s Jan. 6 indictment dramatically less attention than they did Clinton’s server
Major papers are giving Trump’s Jan. 6 indictment dramatically less attention than they did Clinton’s server
In the final weeks of the presidential campaign, major newspapers are giving former President Donald Trump’s federal criminal indictment for alleged crimes related to the January 6 insurrection a fraction of the coverage they gave former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email se...
Report about the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post —
-
26 Articles in the week following Smith's indictment of Trump for his attempted coup
-
100 Articles — nearly 4 times as many — that mentioned Clinton’s server in the week after then-FBI Director James Comey’s notorious October 28, 2016, letter on new developments in that probe--
The US media has learned nothing and is doing a disservice to American voters.
You're viewing a single thread.
The media has been trump badding for the last 9 years straight, what the fuck more do you people want?
If the media treated trump fairly he'd die in prison. So that.
The media does not have the ability to jail people, and it should not influence justice outcomes.
... I am not even going to explain this to you because you're obviously too far gone into the cult
No, please do explain how you think even more trump coverage, despite him appearing negatively in every media outlets for the last nine years would somehow put him in jail.
I'm good on explaining basic shit to empty shells of humans who are devoid of actual care for anyone but their smug selves.
So you can't, but you want constant trump coverage for the next 200 years. I really dislike you conservatives playing your team sports when actual people need help.
Smugness certainly helps everyone along with hollow bullshit arguments with zero facts behind them
Not more, honest. Not sanewashing his incoherent ramblings, calling out his fascist rhetoric for what it is, not talking about what tarrifs would mean for pricing in the US, not emphasizing a small issue on Harris's team while ignoring the couch fucker refusing to say trump won.. or letting him off the hook by saying he would have voted against ratifying.. there is no vote.. it is a ceremonial job.
what the fuck more do you people wan?
What people, exactly?
baddng
Covfefe