You're viewing part of a thread.
Studies have shown that pigs are more intelligent than dogs.
They eat and shit in the same place. Idk what their measure for intelligence is, but most smart mammals don't shit where they eat.
So that makes them undeserving of anything resembling a life. Got you.
Never said anything of the sort, you expired gogurt.
It's what's implied in your statement.
No, you're inserting your own narrative. Alls I said is that pigs ain't smart.
They came in here looking for a fight because someone defaced their propaganda.
No, I'm pointing out the stupidity of the argument that talking = deserving of life.
Also, "propaganda" is an interesting word choice. I bet you would call it something else if it was a message you agreed with.
Vegans being insufferable, what else is new. Fun to imagine them crying and typing their furious little rebuttals to people who honestly don't care.
Maybe we need to flood the conversation with some big steamy pics of bbq pork to chase em away.
Honestly this mindset shows how many quote-unquote leftists turn to right-wing tactics when people critise them for things like these.
Think about it: "Haha these people are insufferable, they must be so mad, we don't care, let's drive them off the board" is how your average 4chan chud reacts to a feminist. It's the same gut instinct.
You guys are the only ones being aggressive, methinks you are projecting.
Things don't literally have to be said to be stated. You brought up that factoid (which got debunked in by someone else in the comment section who actually has experience with pigs) to imply that pigs aren't deserving of empathy like dogs are. There is literally no reason to bring that up other than a pathetic attempt at a rebuttal.
You need to take some meds, bro. Getting this worked up over an internet argument is bad for your health.
Don't fucking "bro" me dude. And I don't want your shitarse condescension.
I'll bro you all I goddamn want motherfucker
So you're going to keep referring to me, a trans woman, with a masculine term, despite the fact that I strongly and firmly told you not to?
Let's see what the mods think about that.
Oh, eat your own ass, you dumb nugget. You never mentioned once anything about being trans, so quit using your status as trans as a Fucking means of attack
Sets us all back, sweetheart.
Besides, me and ada have our differences, But she isn't an idiot when it comes to trans rights issues, And I'm sure she'd be absolutely thrilled to see you. Using your trans identity as it as a card to play against people when you are losing your argument
I'm still waiting to be smote. Surely you weren't talking out of your ass and hoping the LGBTQ+ community would blindly back you up. Surely you don't think the LGBTQ+ are a bunch of morons who will attack at your beck and call.
They came in here looking for a fight because someone defaced their propaganda.
They actually don't. I've raised pigs, and they keep themselves clean- they pick one corner of the pen to shit in and a different corner to sleep and eat in, given the opportunity. The idea that they shit where they eat is probably (dunno for sure) because they clean themselves by taking dust baths, and when it rains, the wallow turns into mud. They roll in the mud to stay cool when it's hot sometimes, but it isn't shit.
We had a pig when I was a kid who could work the lock on her pen and escape into the fields next door to eat grass. They're pretty smart.
Thousands of years of religion forbidding pork because of how unclean pigs are vs this anecdote. Damn, I'm defeated.
Pigs were kept near to people and were a vector for disease because they share similar biology to us. They weren't unclean because they didn't wash their hands or something stupid. They were unclean because they made people sick because of they way we kept them after domestication.
Unclean doesn't always mean "dirty". A lot of things that are considered unclean by different religions are considered so because they're spiritually unclean, rather than literally filthy. Historical riligious objections to pork are probably because of human-transmissible parasites and disease like trichinosis, which aren't as much of a concern anymore.
Using 1000s of years of religion as a source
Calling a primary source just an anecdote
Okay.
Look at this jackass, thinking a collection of stories shared over thousands of years is the same just one little anecdote told by some jagoff on an internet thread.
