You're viewing a single thread.
I understand the sentiment, but Netflix having a monopoly on streaming content wasn't a good situation, either.
19 2 ReplyThe ideal solution is multiple competing services with the same content.
65 0 ReplyLike music streaming services figured out years ago.
26 0 ReplyI'd recommend considering how the recently expired https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc. would have applied to streaming services.
7 0 ReplyYeah, the moment Netflix announced House of Cards, the US government should've hit them with this. Could've prevented this streaming mess.
11 0 Reply
Does Walmart have a monopoly on kinder chocolate? The idea is to have several distributors each with as complete a catalog as possible. Having such a shattered offers between platforms makes it very noncompetitive against any piracy solution.
33 0 ReplyThis right here dammit.
10 0 Reply
There is a difference between 1, 4 and 30 streaming services...
27 0 ReplyThe usurper delivered us from the evil that was cable or nothing.
You either die a hero or live long enough to become the enemy. The cycle must repeat
5 0 Reply