What is Something Scientific that you just don't believe in at all?
What is Something Scientific that you just don't believe in at all?
EDIT: Let's cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We're not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don't believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I'm sure almost everybody has something to add.
You're viewing a single thread.
Baking. People say it's the science of the kitchen but those people just don't use proper measurements when cooking. What they really mean is that it's fiddly as fuck and even following a recipe perfectly isn't a guaranteed success. There's always some shit about "maybe your room temperature was off?" "what altitude did you try the recipe at?". Fuckers. Science doesn't burn me like this. If I follow a scientific procedure where those variables can completely destroy the end result, they get mentioned in the procedure. Baking itself is a science, but it is absolutely not practiced like a science. Baking is a skill for 99% of us. And I'm sick of pretending like it's not.
"cooking is an art, baking is a science".
Bullshit. They're both chemistry. Baking has a lot less wiggle room, and cooking has a lot more backup plans for when you mess up. Both require skill to be good at.
And here I am throwing shit in with random amounts like I'm the Swedish Chef.
"yeah this looks like the right amount of garlic"
You measure salt with a teaspoon.
You measure garlic with your heart.
Chem is science though
Baking is an art as much as a science. People who call it a science just don't understand it.
I'm a former chef, so I call cooking an art, and baking a science. The recipes need a lot more data in baking, so that everyone can follow the recipe and get consistent results. I can eyeball my shit everywhere else and get great results. I still use measuring spoons and cups for some recipes, but most of the time I'm just playing with ingredients, and adding by smell/taste.
Lots of chefs think that way. I did, too, until I dropped the recipes and started experimenting on my own. Getting a feel for bread dough, knowing what various ingredients will do. Feeling out viscosity of batter. It's just as much an art as cooking, if you know what you're doing. And cooking has just as much science, what with acid, maillard reactions, etc.
I mean... it's not like average people can get consistent results with chef recipes, either, without measuring certain ingredients precisely.
Yeah, the way I see it is both are about balancing a bunch of things, but baking has a) more things to balance and b) fewer chances to detect and correct imbalances.
To be fair, there's plenty of scientific studies with results that are hard to reproduce.