Why are you lying instead of addressing the main point? People always resort to fallacy’s when their point is made out to be irrelevant. It seems you don’t have anything actually to add here…?
So.. what are you going on about here? I’m curious why you think people will believe your obvious lies? Sure yeah you can be mad at me for pointing out the obvious that people painfully missed, but that doesn’t make me angry or insulting lmfao.
So what was illegal about it? Or are you not going to address any points and just whine…?
So…. because they aren’t the same user they can ignore the discussion that’s already happening and scream whatever they want! And I can’t defend my own points…?
Does that make any sense lol?
What’s wrong with asking them to address what the discussion is about and what’s wrong with pointing out they aren’t adding to conversation…?
Or is this just a circle jerk thread that I waltz into? Do people really detest conversations? Because that’s what I’m trying to have here, but apparently everyone just wants wants to defend arrowheads shitty way of handling contract disputes.
What was illegal about Sony enforcing their contract? Please explain instead of going off on an irrelevant tangent, can anyone answer? Or are people just going to shout without backing anything up? If someone wants to claim something’a illegal, they should be able to at least explain when asked, but I’m the asshole for asking…? Sure lmfao how does that make any sense?
Nothing is illegal for Sony to enforce their contract with AH, *if" it was in the contract, which no one has explicitly stated it was, other than saying it came up in talks and was something Sony requested of them, whether enforced by contract is unclear without the contracts.
What is illegal is Sony selling games with the foreknowledge that it would be revoking access to those games without compensation. And yes, the publisher is in control of sales, not AH.
Also you need to learn that your can say anything and still come across like a toxic arsehole. Time is everything and difficult through text. I recommend you try and work on that.
Sure, asking someone to backup a clearly asinine claim that something is illegal makes me aggressive…. Maybe don’t make asinine claims like that.
It’s also curious that no one has backed up that claim yet everyone is just insulting me, strange how that happens….
So yeah, how’s it illegal, let’s get back to the point instead of claiming stuff that never happened. Or are our feelings not done being hurt and we need to lash out at other people more since we couldn’t read multiple warnings about an always mandatory thing….?
And what a shocker, another person who just wants to insult instead of addressing any actual discussion….
What’s illegal about enforcing contract obligations? Can anyone actually answer that question? Or is everyone just going to insult anyone trying to have a discussion here?
I'm here off of front page, i just noticed you getting all worked up over nothing and now I'm pushing your buttons because it's fun for me and You're an easy target.
Lmfao, worked up? I think it’s hilarious the trolls that come out and the shit they come up with to defend one corporation while claiming I’m shilling another.
But it’s great you just let everyone know you’re just a sad pitiful troll who didn’t come in here in good faith, great job you’re the problem with these communities, what a piece of fucking work lmfao.
It sounds like your feelings are hurt. I can tell because you're trying to cover it with the 'lmfao'
I know you're not lmfaoing more than once since that's impossible, and you did admit to being aggressive so that does sound manic. Maybe you should take a mental health day and go to a spa or something? It helps when dealing with trolls