Never thought about it but obviously everyman has had a dick in his hand for obvious reasons. And all females old enough for sexual interactions have had one in their hand. This is now stuck in my head. The next time I shake the hand of a woman I am going to wonder how many dicks she has had in that hand.
Honestly curious about this. I don't think that people turn into homosexuals. They either are or aren't at birth. But in the case of lesbians, which you raised, I wonder how many have at least once experimented with at least one hetero interaction which would involve penis holding
Hey, uh, don't refer to male humans as "men" and then female humans as "females" like that. It's kinda dehumanizing.
Like, I get calling men, "males" and women "females", because I'll do that sometimes (I claim fur-brain as my defense, because calling anthro characters "man" or "woman" is weird); but try not to do the thing where you say "men" then "females" as if we're a complete different species. That's... just... not appropriate in a normal context.
Yes! I've been trying to figure out what the fuck the difference is for a long time but for some reason that explanation kept eluding me; I don't mind being called "a female [blank]", but just being called "a female" bothers me. But that's it right there, it's when it's used as a noun.
You're assuming all women of sufficient age have had sex, which is just not true. Many women (and men) don't have an interest in sexual activity, or haven't had an opportunity to engage in it, regardless of age.
obviously everyman has had a dick in his hand for obvious reasons.
This line is trans-exclusive, which would probably be given a pass by all but the most ardent trans-inclusive commenters, but still not great.
And all females
Dude. There are some times when an argument is made that saying "females" is not inherently objectifying, especially in a scientific, military, or other setting where people are categorized that way, with the significant difference being consistency (e.g. man/woman, male/female, etc). Using one then the other strips all that away and makes it seem like referring to women as "females" is just your normal tendency, which strongly suggests the objectifying behavior.
And all females old enough for sexual interactions have had one in their hand.
This is just obviously wrong, as plenty of lesbians, asexual people, or those with lack of access to sexual connections with others have not had a dick in their hands, and that is not an insignificant percentage of women, I'd imagine.
The next time I shake the hand of a woman I am going to wonder how many dicks she has had in that hand.
As if to underline the "females" comment, it's pretty telling that you feel it worth mentioning that you're going to wonder how many dicks were in the hands of women, but not men (especially funny since any man you meet has most likely had a dick in his hand more recently than a woman).
Sometimes it is difficult to notice your own biases, so I hope this makes you think about what leads you toward thinking like this, and just general self-reflection.
It is amazing how so many people cannot simply joke around. Politics so consume their lives every single thing in life is viewed only in that context. And not only cannot they not simply joke around they are on a mission to impose their views on anyone who disagrees with them. What a sad way to go through life. Social media in general is all a joke. And this group specifically is all about just getting a laugh.
I dunno why you're complaining about politics. Your statement was gross, STRONG ick factor. You're getting downvoted as you deserve to be for being so cringe.
Impose their views on people who disagree with them? Damn that's crazy, people want others to treat people with respect and not be bigoted? How political
Of course it's in the eyes of the beholder, like anything is, but from the reaction of others, it seems like most people in this thread agree with me or have a similar viewpoint, so I think it's worth considering why people had that impression. If it's not your views coming out or your intention, fix what was pointed out and there's that.
they are on a mission to impose their views on anyone who disagrees with them. What a sad way to go through life.
Nevertheless, I don't know about you but this doesn't look like a joke, nor does your initial comment, as it seems you're taking what you said quite seriously, I don't see why you'd say that if you weren't.
But anyways, bigoted jokes are just that: bigoted. Not that great of a defence. Nobody has a problem against "joking around", it's more about what your comment was full of.
thanks for encouraging me to "fix" it so I am perfectly aligned with you and "most people in this thread" I wouldn't want to be able to think for myself